1943
DOI: 10.1037/h0055677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A factor analysis of some clinical performance tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1952
1952
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the only other published factor analysis of the Wechsler-Bellevue, Balinsky (i) also found the verbal factor to be of signal importance. 5 Of the six age groups studied, it appeared in all but one and was composed, with but slight exceptions, of the same subtests which load it in the present investigation.…”
Section: The Common Factorsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the only other published factor analysis of the Wechsler-Bellevue, Balinsky (i) also found the verbal factor to be of signal importance. 5 Of the six age groups studied, it appeared in all but one and was composed, with but slight exceptions, of the same subtests which load it in the present investigation.…”
Section: The Common Factorsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although this factor operates as a functional unity in the Wechsler-Bellevue, it could probably be further analyzed. A factorial study addressed to a wide variety of clinical performance tests has been presented by Heston (5). Utilizing tests of the same general type as those which comprise the Wechsler-Bellevue Performance Scale, he found three factors: visualizing spatial relationships, speed of movement, and the ability to grasp readily relationships or configurations of a nonspatial nature.…”
Section: The Common Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murphy (1936) factor analyzed scores from numerous verbal, nonverbal, and mechanical tests and concluded that mechanical ability included two factors: Speed of Eye-Hand Coordination and Mental Manipulation of Spatial Relations. Clarke (1936) reported the Spatial factor loadings of spatial and verbal tests to be inversely related among girls ranging in age from 12 to 15 years, a relationship that has been replicated with males as well as females (Andrew, 1937a(Andrew, , 1937bBroverman & Klaiber, 1969;Emmett, 1949;Estes, 1942;Heston, 1943;Morris, 1939;Slater, 1940;Smith, 1938;Swineford, 1948;Thurstone, 1944Thurstone, , 1947Wittenborn, 1945). This relationship is less likely to obtain for spatial-performance tests highly correlated with general intelligence (e.g., the Block Design subtest of the Wechsler IQ scales, or the Kohs Block Design Test that correlates .80 with Binet IQ scores, Kohs, 1923).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harrell concluded that &dquo;each of the factors can be measured with group paper-and-pencil tests&dquo; equally as well as by the more cumbersomely administered apparatus tests. Estes (28) (56), using 113 college students, factored their scores on 18 clinical performance tests, including, among others, Healy Picture Completion II, Kohs Blocks, Digit Symbol, Minnesota Spatial Relations and Minnesota Manual Dexterity. Three significant factors were extracted: (a) spatial (Minnesota Spatial highest); speed (Minnesota Placing and Turning highest); and (c) ability to grasp non-spatial Gestalt relationships.…”
Section: Recent Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%