2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14163961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Factor Analysis Backpropagation Neural Network Model for Vegetation Net Primary Productivity Time Series Estimation in Western Sichuan

Abstract: Vegetation net primary productivity (VNPP) is the main factor in ecosystem carbon sink function and regulation of environmental processes. However, NPP data products have data missing in some areas, which affects the availability and overall accuracy level of data. Therefore, we adopted the Factor Analysis Backpropagation neural network model (FA-BP model) to acquire a high-accuracy and high-reliability NPP result without missing or empty areas by using a series of easily accessible datasets, such as meteorolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to other studies ( Macias-Fauria, 2018 ; Ge et al., 2021 ; Pei et al., 2022 ), our study also revealed the VEQ in the EPRA has improved to some extent over the past two decades. The areas with increasing and decreasing trends of the VEQI accounted for 82.71% and 14.02% of the total area of the EPRA, respectively, which is also consistent with the findings obtained by Li S. et al, (2022) . However, there are differences in the proportion of areas showing significant increasing and decreasing trends due to differences in study periods, data, and analysis methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar to other studies ( Macias-Fauria, 2018 ; Ge et al., 2021 ; Pei et al., 2022 ), our study also revealed the VEQ in the EPRA has improved to some extent over the past two decades. The areas with increasing and decreasing trends of the VEQI accounted for 82.71% and 14.02% of the total area of the EPRA, respectively, which is also consistent with the findings obtained by Li S. et al, (2022) . However, there are differences in the proportion of areas showing significant increasing and decreasing trends due to differences in study periods, data, and analysis methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this study, the spatial resolution of GF-1 WFV is 16 m. To ensure that the image resolution is the same during the fusion process, we resampled the GF-1 WFV image data to match the spatial resolution of Landsat 8 OLI, which is 30 m. Additionally, the spatial resolution of GLASS LAI is 1 km. Firstly, we used the MODIS Reprojection Tool (MRT) [37,38] to reproject the data to the UTM-WGS84 coordinate system. Then, we performed data mosaicking.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Image Dataset Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%