2005
DOI: 10.1007/11575863_86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fact-Oriented Approach to Activity Modeling

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we investigate the idea of using an ORM model as a starting point to derive an activity model, essentially providing an activity view on the original ORM model. When producing an ORM model of an inherently active domain, the resulting ORM model can provide an appropriate base to start out from. We will illustrate this basic idea by means of a running example. Much work remains to be done, but the results so-far look promissing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considerable research in under way to expand the scope of ORM to other areas such as dynamic rules (e.g. Proper et al, 2005;Balsters et. al., 2006;Morgan, 2006;Balsters & Halpin, 2008), and ontologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable research in under way to expand the scope of ORM to other areas such as dynamic rules (e.g. Proper et al, 2005;Balsters et. al., 2006;Morgan, 2006;Balsters & Halpin, 2008), and ontologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has explored its use in conceptual and ontology modelling, including ORM-based approaches for modelling contextual information [25], e-tutorial systems [31], web systems [9] and in-house decision support systems [41]. ORM has also been used for business rules as a markup language [14] as well as for ontology modelling [26], and reactive behaviour [24] and temporal extensions have been proposed [42,43]. Extensions to ORM's precursor, NIAM [37,38], have also been proposed [44,8,4,55], including a transformation from NIAM into Optimal Normal Form 1 [32,33], a set of rules for schema conversion from NIAM to EER and vice-versa [48], a semantic comparison of the ER model and NIAM [30] and the EER model and NIAM [28], as well as an analytical evaluation of NIAM's grammar for conceptual schema diagrams [54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8) or Event-ConditionAction (ECA) formalisms (e.g. de Brock [3], Lipeck [16], Chomicki [6], Paton & Díaz [20], Snodgrass [23]). Our approach differs from previous work by treating a dynamic rule as a special kind of static rule on the transaction history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%