“…Obviously, this process of PU synthesis is advantageous because the reactions involve only isocyanate monomer and water; it is a more cost effective and environment friendly approach than the classic synthesis of PU, because it replaces expensive amines with water, and in general it proceeds readily at ambient temperature. Through this process, two types of PU materials of different morphologies have been prepared, i.e., solid microspheres without porous structure (Jiang et al, 2012, 2017), and porous PU without regular form or shape (Leventis et al, 2010; Li et al, 2013, 2015a; Weigold et al, 2013; Han et al, 2014, 2016). It is easy to conceive that solid microspheres are of low specific surface area, and their use as support for enzyme and transition metal is not suitable because the amount of immobilized reagent on their surface are limited, or inaccessible as catalytic active site if incorporated in the microspheres; whereas for porous materials with irregular forms, it makes their recovery difficult due to their irregularity combined with their size difference, particularly for the very small ones.…”