2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.09.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A facile bionic strategy towards Gd (III)-imprinted membranes via interlaced stacking of one-dimensional/two-dimensional nanocomposite materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selective separation behavior of Sc 3+ from other REEs through the NDNG membrane is investigated in Figure S12 A. Interestingly, the separation factor of M/Sc increases with the increase of pore size, and the largest separation factor is about 3.7 corresponding to Gd 3+ /Sc 3+ . As shown in Table S2 , the separation performance of the NDNG membrane is very similar to that of ion imprinted membranes ( Cui et al., 2019 ; Li et al., 2015 ; Liu et al., 2014 , 2017 ; Lu et al., 2018 ; Zheng et al., 2017 , 2018 ). Because of the large pores in NDNG-3 (∼65 nm), the selectivity for Sc 3+ from other REEs cannot be attributed to the special pore structure and ionic-radius-based theories ( Sun et al., 2013 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The selective separation behavior of Sc 3+ from other REEs through the NDNG membrane is investigated in Figure S12 A. Interestingly, the separation factor of M/Sc increases with the increase of pore size, and the largest separation factor is about 3.7 corresponding to Gd 3+ /Sc 3+ . As shown in Table S2 , the separation performance of the NDNG membrane is very similar to that of ion imprinted membranes ( Cui et al., 2019 ; Li et al., 2015 ; Liu et al., 2014 , 2017 ; Lu et al., 2018 ; Zheng et al., 2017 , 2018 ). Because of the large pores in NDNG-3 (∼65 nm), the selectivity for Sc 3+ from other REEs cannot be attributed to the special pore structure and ionic-radius-based theories ( Sun et al., 2013 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Adsorption studies showed that the 3D-IIM membrane demonstrated higher adsorption capacity (120.9 mg g -1 ) compared with the PIM (33.6 mg g -1 ). Cui et al [226] prepared Gd(III)-imprinted membranes based on carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide (GO) modified by poly(dopamine). TEM and SEM analysis showed after the polymerization of dopamine roughness of GO had become lower and less transparent.…”
Section: Molecular and Ion-imprinted Membranes (Iim)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same DTPA-based Gd(III)-IIP was used to separate Gd(III) and other lanthanides and actinides (Vigneau et al, 2002). Other studies on imprinted polymer include La(III)-IIP (Mustapa et al, 2016), Ce(III)-IIP (Keçili et al, 2018;Mustapa et al, 2016), Y(III)-IIPs (Zulfikar et al, 2017), Nd(III)-IIP (Moussa et al, 2017), ionic imprinted mesoporous bilayer films (IIBFs) for Dy(III) and Nd(III) adsorption (Zheng et al, 2018), Gd (III)-imprinted membranes (GIMs) (Cui et al, 2019), and Gd(III)-imprinted divinylbenzene and methacrylic acid copolymer (Bunina et al, 2021). The IIPs show a stronger affinity for the imprinted REE cation compared to other REEs.…”
Section: Molecular/ion-imprinted Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%