Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3335203.3335721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Face Morphing Detection Concept with a Frequency and a Spatial Domain Feature Space for Images on eMRTD

Abstract: Since the face morphing attack was introduced by Ferrara et al. in 2014, the detection of face morphings has become a wide spread topic in image forensics. By now, the community is very active and has reported diverse detection approaches. So far, the evaluations are mostly performed on images without post-processing. Face images stored within electronic machine readable documents (eMRTD) are ICAO 1-passport-scaled to a resolution of 413x531 and a JPG or JP2 lesize of 15 kilobytes. This paper introduces a face… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blind detectors usually consist of a feature extraction step followed by a classifier. The features can be handcrafted and describe effects such as the statistical properties of JPG coefficients after double compression [24] or the image impairment/change of spatial frequency distribution that arises from the warping and blending steps during the generation of a morphed face image [25,26]. Furthermore, the noise pattern characteristics of camera sensors [12] can be analyzed for detecting manipulated images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blind detectors usually consist of a feature extraction step followed by a classifier. The features can be handcrafted and describe effects such as the statistical properties of JPG coefficients after double compression [24] or the image impairment/change of spatial frequency distribution that arises from the warping and blending steps during the generation of a morphed face image [25,26]. Furthermore, the noise pattern characteristics of camera sensors [12] can be analyzed for detecting manipulated images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photo Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU) spectral analysis has also been proposed to analyze the alterations caused by morphing features [35]. In [26], the authors design a face morphing detector by combining spatial and frequency feature descriptors from an image. Fuzzy LBP in color channels of HSV and YCbCR color spaces are investigated in [33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face forgery detection has gained momentum recently in the biometric community owing to its vast application, especially in commercial face recognition systems [27,19,53,37,18,10]. Photo-realistic forged images tamper with the functionality and integrity of security checkpoints, where, ideally, there must be a zero-tolerance policy to false acceptance [24,51,12,40]. Introduced in [12], facial morph images, as one of the categories of the forged face images, can bypass established automated face recognition systems, as well as border control officers, where both struggle to distinguish a bona fide image from a morphed one [25] due to delicacy in synthesizing morphed sam-Figure 1: Group Lasso regularization, as a representation learning, leads to selecting the most discriminative subbands for detecting a morphed image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%