2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A European survey on post-mortem inspection of finishing pigs: Total condemnation criteria to declare meat unfit for human consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Essas descobertas são registradas em listas de motivos para condenação, fornecendo informações para monitorar a saúde animal. Além disso, esses dados têm o potencial de revelar tendências e variações na incidência de doenças animais, influenciadas por métodos de criação, fatores epidemiológicos e protocolos profiláticos (PINTO et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Essas descobertas são registradas em listas de motivos para condenação, fornecendo informações para monitorar a saúde animal. Além disso, esses dados têm o potencial de revelar tendências e variações na incidência de doenças animais, influenciadas por métodos de criação, fatores epidemiológicos e protocolos profiláticos (PINTO et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In recent years, there has been a notable shift in post-mortem inspections, moving away from routine palpation and incision towards visual-only post-mortem examinations. This change has allowed the slaughter industry to strike a balance between accurate official control and reduced risk of cross-contamination while remaining cost-effective [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the regulation is not necessarily fulfilled with respect to all detailed requirements and inadequate ante- and post-mortem inspection still occurs. In addition, the EU legislation concerning judgment criteria at meat inspection is mostly generic, allowing flexibility on one side but also subjectivity on the other side ( 6 ). Such variability in meat inspection procedures leaves an open question about the suitability of data collected during meat inspection for animal health and welfare surveillance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%