A European public prosecutor: potential and pitfalls

Wade, Marianne

doi:10.1007/s10611-012-9406-x

Cited by 14 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(32 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…42 Přínos Evropské prokuratury tak může být spatřen v tom, že případy mající evropskou dimenzi mohou být oproštěny z jejich závislosti na národní úrovni. 43 jsou zrcadlením a správným uplatňováním zásady subsidiarity v evropském právu. Zásada subsidiarity nám ve zmíněném kontextu říká, že EU by měla jednat v těch oblastech, ve kterých může dosáhnout sledovaných výsledků efektivněji.…”

Section: Evropský Veřejný žAlobce -Základní Přístupové Bodyunclassified

“…Samotný OLAF několikrát upozornil, že kauzy dopadající na finanční zájmy EU bývají často velmi složité a spletité povahy. 105 Mnozí politici, zákonodárci, právní vědci či jiní stoupenci kladli kontroverzní otázku, zdali není namísto vytvoření specializovaného Úřadu evropské prokuratury vhodnější posílit pravomoci vnitrostátních orgánů ochrany práva pro vymezené úseky působnosti? Zodpovězení této otázky bývá odvozováno od subjektivního přístupu každého řešitele.…”

Section: Závěrunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evropský veřejný žalobce

Kořínek¹

2019

Auc Iuridica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The European Public Prosecutor The article deals with the problematic of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (na. EPPO). This institution was established by the Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office. The article focuses on primary examination of the essential basis of the European Public Prosecutor. The contribution is devided into seven sections. There is an introduction to the issues of the EPPO. The second section is concerning in excursion to the historical contexts of creation of the EPPO. While, the third section deals with the main content of the EPPO. The fourth section is focused on the general competencies of the EPPO. Next part includes the structure of the EPPO. The sixth section deals with mutual relations between the EPPO and the others institutions of the EU. There is a conclusion as the last part of this article which summarizes previous content and brings deliberations de lege ferenda.

show abstract

Section: Evropský Veřejný žAlobce -Základní Přístupové Bodyunclassified

Section: Závěrunclassified

Evropský veřejný žalobce

Kořínek¹

2019

Auc Iuridica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hamran and Szabova 2013;Wade 2013). Despite broad consensus on the shortcomings of the existing system and the efficiency gains created by a EPPO (Bubrowski 2013), the status quo has been maintained so far (Article 86 TFEU requires unanimity).…”

Section: European Public Prosecutor's Officementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Instead they might gain competitive advantages over the drivers. As Klip (2012) and Wade (2013) argue, the detection of fraud may be contrary to member states' economic interests, if, for example, companies illegally obtained subsidies from the EU. Under EnC the drivers would be the only ones bearing the risk.…”

Section: European Public Prosecutor's Officementioning

confidence: 99%

Enhanced cooperation in practice. An analysis of differentiated integration in EU secondary law

Kroll¹,

Leuffen²

2014

Journal of European Public Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article offers a first comprehensive overview of the workings of enhanced cooperation in the European Union (EU). Although this form of secondary law differentiation exists since the Amsterdam Treaty, it has only rarely been used so far. In the article, we formulate a theory of when and why enhanced cooperation is used in EU decision-making. Our theory builds on rationalist institutionalism focussing on institutions, preference constellations and the externality structure of policies. We test the plausibility of our theoretical claims by combining comparative and within-case analyses of nine cases. The empirical findings underline that the usage of enhanced cooperation depends to large degrees on the externality structure of the goods under consideration. The article ends with a short normative evaluation of the enhanced cooperation procedure.

show abstract

Vertical Cooperation

Amicis¹,

Kostoris²

2018

Handbook of European Criminal Procedure

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A European public prosecutor: potential and pitfalls

Cited by 14 publications

References 26 publications

Evropský veřejný žalobce

Evropský veřejný žalobce

Enhanced cooperation in practice. An analysis of differentiated integration in EU secondary law

Vertical Cooperation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About