2021
DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.1014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Euglycemic Glucose Clamp Study to Evaluate the Bioavailability of LY2963016 Relative to Insulin Glargine in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Abstract: Insulin glargine (IGlar) and LY2963016 (LY IGlar) are long-acting insulin analogs with identical primary amino acid sequences. We conducted a randomized, open-label, 2-treatment, 2-period, crossover study in healthy Chinese subjects to evaluate the relative bioavailability of LY IGlar to IGlar and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of LY IGlar. Subjects (n = 58) were randomized to receive single subcutaneous doses (0.5 U/kg) of LY IGlar and IGlar with a ≥7-day washout period between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since a C-peptide suppression of more than 50% is widely recognized as sufficient endogenous insulin suppression, the subjects fell into two groups based on the ratio of C-peptide reduction from baseline (group A: C-peptide reduction <50%; group B: C-peptide reduction ≥50%). The data were collected from a clinical trial (NCT03555305) (Liu et al, 2021), which was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence of an IGlar biosimilar (LY2963016) manufactured by Eli Lilly to Lantus manufactured by Sanofi.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since a C-peptide suppression of more than 50% is widely recognized as sufficient endogenous insulin suppression, the subjects fell into two groups based on the ratio of C-peptide reduction from baseline (group A: C-peptide reduction <50%; group B: C-peptide reduction ≥50%). The data were collected from a clinical trial (NCT03555305) (Liu et al, 2021), which was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence of an IGlar biosimilar (LY2963016) manufactured by Eli Lilly to Lantus manufactured by Sanofi.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study showed (Liu et al, 2021) that for IGlar max, and AUC IGlar, 0-24 h , geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of LY2963016 to Lantus were 0.961 (0.887-1.04) and 0.941 (0.872-1.01), respectively, and dosage proportion of Lantus was significantly different between two groups (Table 1), therefore, matching for dosage proportion of Lantus was performed.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was the first approved insulin biosimilar in the European Union and has also been authorized as a follow-on insulin in the USA [ 17 , 18 ]. The biosimilarity of LY IGlar vs. IGlar was established in a comprehensive clinical development program that included studies in both Chinese and international populations [ 14 , 16 , 19 24 ]. LY IGlar and IGlar demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics in healthy volunteers in separate phase I euglycemic clamp trials conducted in China, Singapore, and South Africa [ 19 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biosimilarity of LY IGlar vs. IGlar was established in a comprehensive clinical development program that included studies in both Chinese and international populations [ 14 , 16 , 19 24 ]. LY IGlar and IGlar demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics in healthy volunteers in separate phase I euglycemic clamp trials conducted in China, Singapore, and South Africa [ 19 21 ]. In randomized phase III studies in patients with T1DM already receiving basal-bolus regimens, LY IGlar and IGlar showed similar efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in the ABES trial in Chinese patients [ 22 ], and in the global ELEMENT-1 trial in predominantly white patients [ 14 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%