2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17144-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dynasearch Neighborhood for the Bicriteria Traveling Salesman Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, despite the fact that the small instances of the single-objective TSP can be solved in a few seconds to optimality by exact algorithms such as concorde (http://www.tsp.gatech.edu/concorde), there are two facts that limit their use under fixed time constraints: the typically large variability in the computation times and the potentially very large number of solutions in the efficient set [15]. Thirdly, significant research efforts have been targeted towards applying SLS algorithms to this problem and it has been studied from several different perspectives: from an approximation [17,18], local search [19][20][21], theoretical [15] and experimental [22] point of view; some related problems have also been studied in the literature [23,24].…”
Section: Multiobjective Optimization and The Mtspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, despite the fact that the small instances of the single-objective TSP can be solved in a few seconds to optimality by exact algorithms such as concorde (http://www.tsp.gatech.edu/concorde), there are two facts that limit their use under fixed time constraints: the typically large variability in the computation times and the potentially very large number of solutions in the efficient set [15]. Thirdly, significant research efforts have been targeted towards applying SLS algorithms to this problem and it has been studied from several different perspectives: from an approximation [17,18], local search [19][20][21], theoretical [15] and experimental [22] point of view; some related problems have also been studied in the literature [23,24].…”
Section: Multiobjective Optimization and The Mtspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLS resembles some other approaches to MOCO such as BLS (Angel et al, 2004b), SEMO and FEMO (Laumanns et al, 2002), PAES (Knowles and Corne, 1999), the local search algorithm mentioned in (Ehrgott and Gandibleux, 2004), as well as the post-processing steps applied in (Hamacher and Ruhe, 1994;Jörnsten et al, 1996;Talbi, 2003). This section shows that PLS examines a polynomial size subset of neighbors at each iteration and that it outputs a maximal Pareto local optimum set.…”
Section: Soundness and Completeness Of Pareto Local Searchmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One common approach to solve MOCO problems is to use the (weak) componentwise ordering when comparing neighboring solutions (Knowles and Corne, 2000;Angel et al, 2004b;Paquete et al, 2004). In that case, the acceptance criterion is to accept a neighbor if it is non (weakly) dominated; since in the local search process we can expect to have more than one solution for which this holds, an additional data structure, which is usually called archive, is used to maintain the current set of solutions.…”
Section: A Basic Iterative Improvement Algorithm For Mocomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, [24] has extended simulating annealing algorithm, [13] did the same for tabu search algorithm and [2,22] extended the steepest descent algorithm to its multi-objective version. Moreover, one field that has been very active during the last two decades is the evolutionary multi-objective optimisation (EMO).…”
Section: Multi-objective Local Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we implement the Pareto local search proposed by [2]. This method is deterministic, i.e.…”
Section: Multi-objective Local Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%