1991
DOI: 10.1038/352411a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamical instability of bars in disk galaxies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
498
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 472 publications
(511 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
13
498
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At T=5 Gyr (shown in the figure), in both cases, this has resulted in a pronounced B/P/X edge-on morphology. The vertical evolution lacks therapid buckling phase often reported in the literature (Raha et al 1991), in which sense it is more reminiscentof the resonance heating models (Quillen et al 2014), where the X is associatedwith disk stars heated by the 2:1 vertical resonance (Combes et al 1990;Pfenniger & Friedli 1991;Patsis et al 2002). Most importantly for the current study, the face-on morphology for = B D 0.08 is similar to that in massive barred galaxies, with a dominant, round barlens structure and a weak, thin bar component (compare to NGC 4548 in the lowermost row; see for classification of observed barlens categories): this structure survived to the end of the simulation (12 Gyr).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At T=5 Gyr (shown in the figure), in both cases, this has resulted in a pronounced B/P/X edge-on morphology. The vertical evolution lacks therapid buckling phase often reported in the literature (Raha et al 1991), in which sense it is more reminiscentof the resonance heating models (Quillen et al 2014), where the X is associatedwith disk stars heated by the 2:1 vertical resonance (Combes et al 1990;Pfenniger & Friedli 1991;Patsis et al 2002). Most importantly for the current study, the face-on morphology for = B D 0.08 is similar to that in massive barred galaxies, with a dominant, round barlens structure and a weak, thin bar component (compare to NGC 4548 in the lowermost row; see for classification of observed barlens categories): this structure survived to the end of the simulation (12 Gyr).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disk formed a bar thatsubsequently experienced vertical thickening via the buckling instability (Toomre 1966, p. 111;Raha et al 1991;Sellwood & Wilkinson 1993) and developed the peanut-shaped bulge that is characteristic of this instability. After the disk reached a nearly steady state (simulation time t 1 =700), a central point mass 5 representing an SMBH of mass 0.2% M d was grown adiabatically (for details see Brown et al 2013).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, studies of orbits in 2D N-body bars largely confirmed the picture arising from the study of periodic orbits and showed that many regular orbits elongated along the bar were parented by x1 orbits, a small fraction were parented by retrograde x4 orbits (Sparke & Sellwood 1987), and none were parented by prograde x2 orbits. The realization that bars can also undergo buckling instabilities (Combes & Sanders 1981;Raha et al 1991), which makes them develop substantial vertical thickness and peanut-shaped morphologies, led to the study of periodic orbits in three-dimensional bars (Pfenniger 1984;Martinet & de Zeeuw 1988;Pfenniger & Friedli 1991;Skokos et al 2002aSkokos et al , 2002b. It was shown that theappearance of specific morphological features in images of bars, such as the X-shape and peanut features seen in edge-on bars and the boxy/rectangular isophotes and "ansae" of face-on bars, could be explained by orbits trapped around specific periodic orbit families (Patsis et al 2002(Patsis et al , 2003(Patsis et al , 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of bars too are now well established in this context. Bars are known to grow via transferring angular momentum outward and eventually goes through the buckling instability to form a boxy/peanut bulges (Combes et al 1990;Raha et al 1991;Athanassoula & Misiriotis 2002;Debattista et al 2004;Saha et al 2010;Saha & Naab 2013). Apart from hosting spiral arms and bars, many disc galaxies are also lopsided (m = 1 perturbation) and generally the asymmetry is prominent in the outer parts of the galaxy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%