2005
DOI: 10.1007/11590354_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dynamic Web Service Selection Strategy with QoS Global Optimization Based on Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies only considered sequential composition structure [25]- [28], and some studies did not consider the global quality of service (QoS) constraints [25], [27]- [30]. Only single solutions were given by other studies [29], [31], [32].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies only considered sequential composition structure [25]- [28], and some studies did not consider the global quality of service (QoS) constraints [25], [27]- [30]. Only single solutions were given by other studies [29], [31], [32].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic algorithms have recently been leveraged for solving QoS-aware service composition problems [13,14,15,16]. While some are solving single-objective optimization problems [14], other approaches deal with multi-objective problems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let pr be the offered price value, the price aggregation is formulated based on (12) for the sequence pattern as in Observation 2. For the parallel pattern as in Observation 3, the price aggregation is formulated based on (13). Meanwhile, (14) is applied for parallel pattern as in Observation 4.…”
Section: Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, consistency check for candidates for c results in only c 7 as the consistent candidate. Obviously c 7 is selected for activity c. Once all activities have been assigned with a candidate, the aggregation of price is computed as in (13).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation