2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2017.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic systems approach to wait time in the second language classroom

Abstract: This study discusses how wait time-the silent pause after a teacher elicits a student response-alters classroom discourse. Previous wait time research suggests overall positive changes in both teacher and student discourse where wait time is over 1 second. However, such studies are primarily structuralist in nature and tend to reduce the intricacy of classroom behavior to distinct variables, which can be easily altered to achieve a desired result. The data presented here comes from a series of structured obser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defined as the silent duration between a teacher elicitation and student response, research suggests that by extending their silent wait time after solicits, teachers can improve the quality of classroom discourse and combat student non-responsiveness (Rowe 1986;Shrum 1985). In a recent mixed methods investigation into instances of wait time within a UK university second language classroom, Smith and King (2017) discovered that wait time played an intricate role in shaping classroom discourse patterns, with extended wait times of more than 2 s in length working to temporarily shift discourse out of a rigid Initiation Response Feedback (IRF) pattern (see Sinclair and Coulthard 1975) into a new, more student-driven phase. In contrast to this, Ingram and Elliot (2014), researching within secondary mathematics classrooms, found that outside of the IRF pattern, extending wait time may work against student self-selection as it reinforces the teacher's control over classroom discourse and may hinder more naturally flowing interactions.…”
Section: Silence In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defined as the silent duration between a teacher elicitation and student response, research suggests that by extending their silent wait time after solicits, teachers can improve the quality of classroom discourse and combat student non-responsiveness (Rowe 1986;Shrum 1985). In a recent mixed methods investigation into instances of wait time within a UK university second language classroom, Smith and King (2017) discovered that wait time played an intricate role in shaping classroom discourse patterns, with extended wait times of more than 2 s in length working to temporarily shift discourse out of a rigid Initiation Response Feedback (IRF) pattern (see Sinclair and Coulthard 1975) into a new, more student-driven phase. In contrast to this, Ingram and Elliot (2014), researching within secondary mathematics classrooms, found that outside of the IRF pattern, extending wait time may work against student self-selection as it reinforces the teacher's control over classroom discourse and may hinder more naturally flowing interactions.…”
Section: Silence In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silent behaviors commonly observed in East Asian language learners was once viewed unfavorably as an indication of nonparticipation and a hindrance to learning (Tsou, 2005). However, the extensive research on silence discovered that it had multiple meanings and served different purposes in second language learning contexts (Bao, 2014;Karas, 2017;Smith & King, 2017) In Chapter 5, Maher uses cognitive-behavioral theory (CBT) to examine the relationship between language learners' silent behavior and anxiety in Japanese EFL contexts. After unstructured and structured observations, the author focuses on an English major Mari for further investigation and four CBT-style interviews have been conducted.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silent behaviors commonly observed in East Asian language learners was once viewed unfavorably as an indication of nonparticipation and a hindrance to learning (Tsou, 2005). However, the extensive research on silence discovered that it had multiple meanings and served different purposes in second language learning contexts (Bao, 2014;Karas, 2017;Smith & King, 2017) In Chapter 5, Maher uses cognitive-behavioral theory (CBT) to examine the relationship between language learners' silent behavior and anxiety in Japanese EFL contexts. After unstructured and structured observations, the author focuses on an English major Mari for further investigation and four CBT-style interviews have been conducted.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%