1970
DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(70)90095-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic programming successive approximations technique with convergence proofs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To tackle this dimensional problem, the class of discrete DP techniques -DP successive approximation (Larson 1968;Larson and Korsak 1970), increment DP (Hall et al 1969), discrete differential DP (Heidari et al 1971), incremental DP successive approximation (Giles and Wunderlich 1981), and folded DP (Kumar and Baliarsingh 2003) -is available. However, the discrete algorithms are unsuitable because the state variables -upper and lower water levels or storages -of the rule curve searching are continuous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle this dimensional problem, the class of discrete DP techniques -DP successive approximation (Larson 1968;Larson and Korsak 1970), increment DP (Hall et al 1969), discrete differential DP (Heidari et al 1971), incremental DP successive approximation (Giles and Wunderlich 1981), and folded DP (Kumar and Baliarsingh 2003) -is available. However, the discrete algorithms are unsuitable because the state variables -upper and lower water levels or storages -of the rule curve searching are continuous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, starting with an initial trajectory xo(kT) sufficiently close to the optimum one yields this optimum solution. 21 The speed of convergence of the algorithm may be improved significantly by testing at each iteration only those states (i.e. the quantized values) lying in a strip defined around the previous trajectory (see Figure 5).…”
Section: Pi(kt) = G(qi(kt) Hi(kt)j (14)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a variety of improved DP algorithms have been extensively used (Zhao et al, 2014), such as Discrete Differential Dynamic Programming (DDDP) (Heidari et al, 1971;Chow et al, 1975;Liao and Shoemaker, 1991;Tospornsampan et al, 2005), Incremental Dynamic Programming (IDP) (Mathlouthi and Lebdi, 2009), Dynamic Programming with Successive Approximation (DPSA) (Larson and Korsak, 1970;Opan, 2011), Incremental Dynamic Programming and Successive Approximations (IDPSA) (Trott and Yeh, 1973), Progressive Optimality Algorithm (POA) (Turgeon, 1981;Cheng et al, 2012;Lu et al, 2013), and so on. These improved DP algorithms have effectively avoided the ''curse of dimensionality'' problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%