2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic poroelastic model for auxetic polyurethane foams involving viscoelasticity and pneumatic damping effects in the linear regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bending moduli of the auxetic foams along d 2 in Fig. 8 and the effect of r c are quite close to the results obtained in previous papers [25,26,77] of the same type auxetic foam under the cyclic quasistatic compression/tension loading along d 2 . For example, the modulus at 10% strain of auxetic foams with different r c under quasi-static cyclic tensile loading along d 2 varies between 0.5 and 2 MPa, and mostly clusters around 0.5 MPa [25,26], which is close to the value of the bending modulus corresponding to the 5 mm amplitude.…”
Section: Modified Normalized Bouc-wen Model For the Concentrated Para...supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bending moduli of the auxetic foams along d 2 in Fig. 8 and the effect of r c are quite close to the results obtained in previous papers [25,26,77] of the same type auxetic foam under the cyclic quasistatic compression/tension loading along d 2 . For example, the modulus at 10% strain of auxetic foams with different r c under quasi-static cyclic tensile loading along d 2 varies between 0.5 and 2 MPa, and mostly clusters around 0.5 MPa [25,26], which is close to the value of the bending modulus corresponding to the 5 mm amplitude.…”
Section: Modified Normalized Bouc-wen Model For the Concentrated Para...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…For example, the modulus at 10% strain of auxetic foams with different r c under quasi-static cyclic tensile loading along d 2 varies between 0.5 and 2 MPa, and mostly clusters around 0.5 MPa [25,26], which is close to the value of the bending modulus corresponding to the 5 mm amplitude. In comparison, the modulus at 1% strain of the different auxetic foams under quasi-static cyclic compressive-tensile loading along d 2 mainly ranges between 0.5 and 3 MPa, and concentrates around 1 MPa [77], close to the bending modulus at 1 mm amplitude. This difference can also be justified by the fact that the bending modulus is derived from a Euler-Bernoulli beam formulation that neglects the shear deformation.…”
Section: Modified Normalized Bouc-wen Model For the Concentrated Para...mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…[ 40,41 ] From the hysteretic loops, the tangent modulus E t and the quasi‐static loss factor ηC/T were computed. The quasi‐static loss factor of the compression test is the ratio of the energy dissipated per cycle (ΔWC/T) to the elastic energy stored by the sample (UC/T) over the cycle [ 52 ] ηC/T=2ΔWC/TπUC/T…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure described in this paragraph shows the methodology previously used in ref. [52]. Low‐amplitude white noise tests were conducted using an electrodynamic shaker (LDS, Model V406) to determine the effect of moisture on the energy absorption of the foams ( Figure 3 a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation