2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-020-0770-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic nomenclature proposal for SARS-CoV-2 lineages to assist genomic epidemiology

Abstract: The ongoing pandemic spread of a novel human coronavirus, SARS-COV-2, associated with severe pneumonia disease (COVID-19), has resulted in the generation of tens of thousands of virus genome sequences. The rate of genome generation is unprecedented, yet there is currently no coherent nor accepted scheme for naming the expanding phylogenetic diversity of SARS-CoV-2. We present a rational and dynamic virus nomenclature that uses a phylogenetic framework to identify those lineages that contribute most to active s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
2,487
2
16

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,444 publications
(2,540 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
35
2,487
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Our inference is also supported by the observation that a mutant of proCoV2 containing μ variants, but no α variants, was isolated in the United States on pandemic day 59. This means that the root of the SARS-CoV-2 phylogeny is on a lineage before α1 appeared, which is inconsistent with the previous inference 26 .…”
Section: A Mutational History Of Sars-cov-2contrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Our inference is also supported by the observation that a mutant of proCoV2 containing μ variants, but no α variants, was isolated in the United States on pandemic day 59. This means that the root of the SARS-CoV-2 phylogeny is on a lineage before α1 appeared, which is inconsistent with the previous inference 26 .…”
Section: A Mutational History Of Sars-cov-2contrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Our neighbor-joining tree based on distances from 9 clades suggests that SARS-CoV-2 appears originated from multiple zoonotic reservoirs instead of a single direct ancestor ( Figure S4). In addition, our classification rationales are largely in agreement with published reports [30]; for example, Cluster S is in accordance with previously defined S type [31] and Cluster G is in line with GISAID [32] defined the G clade. Cluster L is similar to the V and L clades combined, of GISAID.…”
Section: Clade-associated Biased Mutation Trend In Sars-cov-2 Revealesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For SARS-CoV-2 lineage classification, consensus genomes were submitted to Pangolin software (https://github.com/cov-lineages/pangolin, downloaded on June 10 th , 2020) and to CoV-GLUE lineage system (http://cov-glue.cvr.gla.ac.uk/#/home, accessed on June 10 th , 2020) [25], both based on the nomenclature proposed by Rambaut et al [26]. An alignment including the consensus sequences generated and genomes from Brazilian sequences available on the GISAID Database classified as B1, B1.1 and the Brazilian clusters B1.1-BR/ B1.1-EU/BR (S1 Table) were submitted to a maximum likelihood phylogenic reconstruction using PhyML v.3.0 and the best model of nucleotide substitution was defined with Model Generator (GTR) to investigate the sublineage classification of the study sequences [16,27,28].…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 Classification and Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%