2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2018.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic network model of the unsecured interbank lending market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of monitoring in networks has been identified by a number of empirical papers but they are mostly reduced form in nature and cannot quantify the magnitude of monitoring costs nor explain the emergence of the network structure, e.g., Cocco et al (2009), Furfine (2001), Affinito (2012), ?. Blasques et al (2018) simulate a dynamic model of the overnight interbank market for 50 banks and recover parameters by matching characteristics of the network between 50 large banks in the Netherlands. While they focus on banks meeting liquidity shocks in the overnight market, we estimate monitoring between a disjoint set of lenders and borrowers in meeting persistent funding needs, which is consistent with the full sample of interbank loans.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of monitoring in networks has been identified by a number of empirical papers but they are mostly reduced form in nature and cannot quantify the magnitude of monitoring costs nor explain the emergence of the network structure, e.g., Cocco et al (2009), Furfine (2001), Affinito (2012), ?. Blasques et al (2018) simulate a dynamic model of the overnight interbank market for 50 banks and recover parameters by matching characteristics of the network between 50 large banks in the Netherlands. While they focus on banks meeting liquidity shocks in the overnight market, we estimate monitoring between a disjoint set of lenders and borrowers in meeting persistent funding needs, which is consistent with the full sample of interbank loans.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The endogenous matching process, generates a counterparty selection bias, and can be seen as a specification error in the spirit of Heckman (1979). 5 We show that the role played by money market-specific unobservable factors (such as monitoring and searching costs, see Afonso and Lagos, 2015;Blasques et al, 2016) and the presence of the central bank as a lender of last resort lead to a non-standard estimation framework that departs from a classic dyadic econometric model (Cameron and Miller, 2014;Kenny et al, 2006). To solve this issue we apply a control function approach to account for the selection bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A large number of theories have been proposed to explain the features of bilateral trades in OTC markets (see Afonso and Lagos, 2015;Bech and Monnet, 2016;Blasques et al, 2016;Duffie et al, 2005, among the others), but the empirical literature still lacks in providing econometric models and evidences to better understand these pairwise outcomes. While there are empirical studies investigating interbank markets after the 2008 crisis (Afonso et al, 2011;Angelini et al, 2011), few evidences about the European sovereign crisis are available in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lux (2015) introduces a simple dynamic agent-based model that, starting from a heterogeneous bank size distribution and relying on a reinforcement learning algorithm based on trust, allows the system to naturally evolve toward a core-periphery structure where core banks assume the role of mediators between the liquidity needs of many smaller banks. Blasques et al (2018) propose a dynamic network model of interbank lending for the Dutch interbank market, pointing out that credit-risk uncertainty and peer monitoring are driving factors for the sparse core-periphery structure. e paper is structured as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%