2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00148-005-0034-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic general equilibrium analysis of the political economy of public education

Abstract: The primary objective of this paper is to highlight the distinct roles of altruism and of self-interest in the political determination of a public education policy. I assess the relative importance of three factors in the determination of the equilibrium level of this policy: altruism, the impact of public funding of education on social security benefits and its impact on factor prices.I then focus on the impact of implementing a social security system on the equilibrium levels of education funding and on welf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in the same spirit as the key result of the above three papers mentioned above. However, the result changes once the general equilibrium e¤ects are taken into account and this somewhat supports the …ndings by Soares (2006) and very recently by Kaganovich and Zilcha (2012). 18 In equilibrium, the objective function for the political candidates becomes W (S t ; t ; t ) = !V o t (S t ; t ; t ) + V m t (S t ; t ; t ).…”
Section: Political Economy Of Two-armed Intergenerational Transferssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in the same spirit as the key result of the above three papers mentioned above. However, the result changes once the general equilibrium e¤ects are taken into account and this somewhat supports the …ndings by Soares (2006) and very recently by Kaganovich and Zilcha (2012). 18 In equilibrium, the objective function for the political candidates becomes W (S t ; t ; t ) = !V o t (S t ; t ; t ) + V m t (S t ; t ; t ).…”
Section: Political Economy Of Two-armed Intergenerational Transferssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In a relatively recent work, Rangel (2003) also focuses on the issue of sustainability when both forward and backward intergenerational goods are present and shows that backward intergenerational goods (BIGs), such as social security, play a crucial role in sustaining investment in forward intergenerational goods (FIGs) like education: without them investment is ine¢ ciently low, but with them optimal investment is possible. In contrast to these partial equilibrium studies, Soares (2006) in a calibrated general equilibrium OLG framework …nds that infusing a PAYG system exogenously results in a political equilibrium with lower funding for public education compared to the case when social security is absent. This happens because, under PAYG scheme, the increased incentive in investing in young's education to expand future wage bill is cancelled out by the increase in future interest rate, and thus the public education investment has no direct positive e¤ect on the present value of social security bene…ts (Kaganovich and Zilcha, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Numerical simulations show the group of rich and poor prefer centralisation and the middle class prefers local education. Soares (2006) extends the political economy model of public funded education by using the general equilibrium overlapping generation model with altruism. 17.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study is related to the literature on the political economy of public education and pensions by Bearse, Glomm, and Janeba (2001), Soares (2006), Iturbe-Ormaetxe and Valera (2012), Kaganovich and Meier (2012), Kaganovich and Zilcha (2012), and Naito (2012). A common feature of these studies is that the two-dimensional voting aspect is reduced to one dimension for simplicity of analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%