2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic fuzzy interactive approach for DG expansion planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To deal with that, many methods have been proposed [9]. Cost modeling is a common approach in planning [10][11][12] that determines the siting and sizing problems together. Other methods use different indices [13][14][15][16][17][18], such as voltage regulation, environmental factors, power loss related, maximum DG capacity, and so on, to assess the performance of the system after the new unit is installed.…”
Section: Nomenclature B(l)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with that, many methods have been proposed [9]. Cost modeling is a common approach in planning [10][11][12] that determines the siting and sizing problems together. Other methods use different indices [13][14][15][16][17][18], such as voltage regulation, environmental factors, power loss related, maximum DG capacity, and so on, to assess the performance of the system after the new unit is installed.…”
Section: Nomenclature B(l)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a large amount of historical data analysis, stochastic output is abstracted into multiple scenarios with their probability of occurrence, and then substituted it into multi-objective planning model [32,33]. Reference [34] put forward a dynamic fuzzy interactive approach for expansion planning in a long term period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the main difference between these papers is the algorithm used: the methodologies presented in [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] use genetic based algorithms; in [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], particle swarm optimization (PSO)-based algorithms were applied. There are still some others less used algorithms: successive elimination [21], mixed-integer linear programming [22], artificial neural network [23], chaotic local search with modified honey bee mating optimization [24], Bellman-Zadeh [25], bacterial foraging optimization [26], dynamic programming [27] and hierarchical agglomerative clustering [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%