2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic and on-line ensemble regression for changing environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more reasonable method is to equip the local models with dynamic weights assignment according to the correlation between query data and local regions, which indicates that adaptive weighting manner is preferable. To this end, the adaptive weights are generally assigned as the normalized distances from query data to the centers of each local region or the quantified prediction performance of the latest measured sample . However, both distance‐based and prediction performance–based approaches are confronted with potential problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more reasonable method is to equip the local models with dynamic weights assignment according to the correlation between query data and local regions, which indicates that adaptive weighting manner is preferable. To this end, the adaptive weights are generally assigned as the normalized distances from query data to the centers of each local region or the quantified prediction performance of the latest measured sample . However, both distance‐based and prediction performance–based approaches are confronted with potential problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Ensemble pruning -In practice, the ensemble size is usually bounded due to the limitation of resources. A simple pruning strategy is to remove the worst performance model whenever the upper bound of the ensemble is reached [22,23]. The effective ensemble size can also be dynamically determined by approaches, such as instance based pruning [17] and ordered aggregation [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major difference between our work and some previous efforts for power plant modeling [28] is that we consider modeling in dynamic environments. The algorithm we applied is mostly based on the DOER algorithm (Dynamic and On-line Ensemble Regression) proposed in [23], considering its overall better performance on multiple synthetic and real (industry applications) data sets when compared to several state-of-the-art algorithms. For the same reason, we will not provide comparison to other approaches in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all these listed methods do not add and remove models over time; but the on-line inclusion and removal of models is an important key for improving ensemble prediction performance. Additive Expert (AddExp) [26], On-line Weighted Ensemble (OWE) [27] and Dynamic and On-line Ensemble Regression (DOER) [28] add new models when the ensemble's error on the newest sample is greater than a threshold, and remove inaccurate models over time; while Online Accuracy Updated Ensemble (OAUE) [29] and Learn ++ .NSE [21] add and remove models when a batch is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%