I ssues that are central to the modeling and analysis of a human movement system include musculotendon dynamics, the kinetics and kinematics of the biomechanical system, and the determination of neurological controls that are pertinent to a particular movement. In formulating a model for a biological control system, realism and complexity are always competing concerns. Human motion involves neurons, muscles, chemical reactions, bones, joints, and ligaments. How realistic can a model be made and still be simple enough for practical implementation and analytical tractability? What features of these enormously complex mechanisms are essential to include in the model, and which may be left out? Clearly, part of the answer to these questions lies in the specific model to be analyzed and the purpose for which it is to be used. This article focuses on the dynamics and control of ocular and skeletal systems. The discussion of these systems provides insights into modeling issues that are common to the study of human movement systems.One of the first human movement systems to be studied was the ocular motor system. In 1630, Descartes [1] proposed a model of eye movement based on the principle of reciprocal innervation, a notion of paired muscular activity in which a contraction of one muscle is associated with the re-laxation of the other. Since that time, modeling of the human ocular system and its dynamic properties have been studied extensively by neurologists, physiologists, and engineers [2]- [14]. Both practical and theoretical motivations exist for considering the ocular movement system. Clinical applications include the diagnosis and treatment of strabismus, muscle palsy, and the effects of neurological disorders. From a control-theoretic viewpoint, the ocular system is of relatively low dimension and easier to control than other neuromuscular systems. By scrutinizing the trajectories of eye movements, it is possible to infer the effects of motoneuronal activity; to deduce the central nervous system's control strategy; and, because of the relatively small number of actuators in this system, to more systematically observe the effects of perturbations in musculotendon parameters, as well as neural controls.Models of the musculoskeletal system also provide a means for elucidating the relationships between form and function. For instance, understanding the adaptation of femoral structures to mechanical stimuli by joint and muscle loading is basic to the notion of bone remodeling, first proposed by Wolf [15]. Since the first systematic study of the muscle-bone unloading principle by Pauwels [16], there have been several investigations into the role of muscle forces on the loading conditions of bone and subsequent stress development [17]-[24]. There are several practical and clinical motivations for studying neuromuscular effects on stress development. For 70 IEEE Control Systems Magazine