2014
DOI: 10.1515/jgth-2014-0039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dual version of Huppert's conjecture on conjugacy class sizes

Abstract: In [J. Algebra 344 (2011), 205–228], a conjecture of J. G. Thompson for PSL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analogues of Huppert's conjecture can be proposed for any set of integers related to a finite group. For instance, a dual version of Huppert's conjecture for the set of conjugacy class sizes is considered in [1][2][3] and verified for some families of simple groups such as PSL (2, q).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogues of Huppert's conjecture can be proposed for any set of integers related to a finite group. For instance, a dual version of Huppert's conjecture for the set of conjugacy class sizes is considered in [1][2][3] and verified for some families of simple groups such as PSL (2, q).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a dual version of Huppert's conjecture for the set of conjugacy class sizes is considered. For more results see [1,2,3]. In this paper, we are concerned with the following conjecture, inspired by Huppert's conjecture: Conjucture: Let G be a finite group and H a non-abelian simple group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where G ∼ = U 3 (3) or U 4 (2), we see that cod(G) contains a prime, a contradiction. Thus G is perfect and (2). Also by [10], we know that Mult(U 3 (3)) = 1 and Mult(U (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2015, it has been investigated that the above problem is true when S PSL 2 (q) [8]. Then, in [7], it has been proven that the answer of the above problem is true for many families of finite simple groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%