2011
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing

Abstract: In the present theoretical note we examine how different learning constraints, thought to be involved in optimizing the mapping of print to meaning during reading acquisition, might shape the nature of the orthographic code involved in skilled reading. On the one hand, optimization is hypothesized to involve selecting combinations of letters that are the most informative with respect to word identity (diagnosticity constraint), and on the other hand to involve the detection of letter combinations that correspo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

47
373
2
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 362 publications
(448 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
47
373
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, found a transposed-letter effect that was not restricted to the most posterior electrode sites, but rather had a broader distribution up to the median sites. Although the specific scalp topography seems to vary across studies, these previous data strongly support the hypothesis that components arising in this 120-200 ms time-window reflect an early perceptual process in which the mapping of visual features onto abstract orthographic representations has been initiated (see also Grainger & Ziegler, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, found a transposed-letter effect that was not restricted to the most posterior electrode sites, but rather had a broader distribution up to the median sites. Although the specific scalp topography seems to vary across studies, these previous data strongly support the hypothesis that components arising in this 120-200 ms time-window reflect an early perceptual process in which the mapping of visual features onto abstract orthographic representations has been initiated (see also Grainger & Ziegler, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Targets preceded by a transposed letter reference were associated with less negativegoing waveforms than targets preceded by a replaced letter reference. The authors concluded that letter strings triggered a qualitatively distinct type of processing compared to other types of character strings (see also Carreiras, Quiñones, Hernández-Cabrera, & Duñabeitia, 2015) and interpreted this pattern of effects as reflecting the initial parallel mapping of visual features onto location-specific letter identities, as proposed by Grainger and Ziegler (2011;see also Grainger & van Heuven, 2003). Besides, in masked priming studies of word processing, it has been shown that the N/P150 component, which occurs in the 125-175 ms time-window, is sensitive to physical differences between primes and targets (Chauncey, Holcomb, & Grainger, 2008;Massol, Grainger, Midgley, & Holcomb, 2012;Petit, Midgley, Holcomb, & Grainger, 2006), but also sensitive to the degree of orthographic overlap between primes and targets (Carreiras, Perea, Vergara, & Pollatsek, 2009;Grainger, Kiyonaga, & Holcomb, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results can also be discussed in light of the recent dual-route approach to orthographic processing proposed by Grainger and Ziegler (2011). In this framework, two orthographic codes are assumed to map orthographic strings to meaning, namely, a coarse-grained orthographic code and a fine-grained orthographic code.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Grainger and Ziegler's (2011) model, two sublexical orthographic codes are postulated which differ in terms of their level of precision of letter position encoding. In addition, these codes vary in their mapping of orthography either (a) directly onto semantic representations or (b) onto sublexical morphological and phonological representations that are already stored in the lexicon, and from there to semantics.…”
Section: Grainger and Ziegler's (2011) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%