2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2017.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dual role for the RhoGEF Ephexin5 in regulation of dendritic spine outgrowth

Abstract: The outgrowth of new dendritic spines is closely linked to the formation of new synapses, and is thought to be a vital component of the experience-dependent circuit plasticity that supports learning. Here, we examined the role of the RhoGEF Ephexin5 in driving activity-dependent spine outgrowth. We found that reducing Ephexin5 levels increased spine outgrowth, and increasing Ephexin5 levels decreased spine outgrowth in a GEF-dependent manner, suggesting that Ephexin5 acts as an inhibitor of spine outgrowth. No… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If hormones do not play a role in the pruning and stabilization of dendritic spines on layer 5 neurons, then what factors drive these processes? Age, neural activity, and stress hormones can be linked to changes in intracellular proteins ( Gray et al, 2006 ; Hamilton et al, 2017 ; Liston et al, 2013 ) and cell–cell adhesion molecules ( Kwon et al, 2012 ) that may play a regulatory role in spine maturation. Experience itself (or the lack of experience) may also drive the stabilization of synapses and serve to regulate plasticity ( Johnson et al, 2016b ; Panchanathan and Frankenhuis, 2016 ; Roberts et al, 2010 ; Wilbrecht et al, 2010 ; Wilbrecht et al, 2006 ; Zuo et al, 2005b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If hormones do not play a role in the pruning and stabilization of dendritic spines on layer 5 neurons, then what factors drive these processes? Age, neural activity, and stress hormones can be linked to changes in intracellular proteins ( Gray et al, 2006 ; Hamilton et al, 2017 ; Liston et al, 2013 ) and cell–cell adhesion molecules ( Kwon et al, 2012 ) that may play a regulatory role in spine maturation. Experience itself (or the lack of experience) may also drive the stabilization of synapses and serve to regulate plasticity ( Johnson et al, 2016b ; Panchanathan and Frankenhuis, 2016 ; Roberts et al, 2010 ; Wilbrecht et al, 2010 ; Wilbrecht et al, 2006 ; Zuo et al, 2005b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a more in depth analysis of mitochondrial dynamics is needed in tbl neurons, the possibility exists that alterations to the interactions between Rab proteins and mutated HERC1 could alter late endosome-mitochondrial relationships; inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and eliciting the anomalous mitophagy that disrupts neuronal homeostasis (Martinez-Vicente, 2017). The E3 ligases in the UPS have been implicated in the maintenance of spine size, density and number, through regulation of AMPA receptor expression, or of NMDA receptor and RhoA activity (Hamilton and Zito, 2013;Mertz et al, 2015;Hamilton et al, 2017). Indeed, spinogenesis is also dampened when UPS activity is blocked (Hamilton and Zito, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the complete loss of Ephexin5 prevents neuronal activity from promoting spinogenesis. Taken together, these data indicate that Ephexin5 may serve as a beacon locating sites of new spine formation keeping them in check until incoming activity promotes spine formation at these sites [74].…”
Section: Ephexin Familymentioning
confidence: 99%