Abstract:Synapses are fundamental information processing units that rely on voltage-gated Ca2+ (Cav) channels to trigger Ca2+-dependent neurotransmitter release. Cav channels also play Ca2+-independent roles in other biological contexts, but whether they do so in axon terminals is unknown. Here, we addressed this unknown with respect to the requirement for Cav1.4 L-type channels for the formation of rod photoreceptor synapses in the retina. Using a mouse strain expressing a non-conducting mutant form of Cav1.4, we repo… Show more
“…Thus, they are in different positions and with different combinations of glutamate receptors within the area of glutamate spillover diffusion; GABA and ephaptic conduction are probably also involved here ( Kramer and Davenport, 2015 ; Petralia et al, 2017 ). The main invaginating structures extend from bipolar and horizontal cells; their invagination and function are partly dependent on trans-synaptic complexes of proteins including calcium channel subunits and receptors ( Kerschensteiner, 2017 ; Wang et al, 2017 ; Cao et al, 2020 ; Maddox et al, 2020 ; Tsukamoto et al, 2021 ). Invaginating horizontal cell processes form a type of reciprocal synapse including a feed-forward function along with negative feedback to provide lateral inhibition to help the brain modulate signals from groups of adjacent photoreceptor cells.…”
Invaginating structures are common in the synapses of most animals. However, the details of these invaginating structures remain understudied in part because they are not well resolved in light microscopy and were often misidentified in early electron microscope (EM) studies. Utilizing experimental techniques along with the latest advances in microscopy, such as focused ion beam-scanning EM (FIB-SEM), evidence is gradually building to suggest that the synaptic invaginating structures contribute to synapse development, maintenance, and plasticity. These invaginating structures are most elaborate in synapses mediating rapid integration of signals, such as muscle contraction, mechanoreception, and vision. Here we argue that the synaptic invaginations should be considered in future studies seeking to understand their role in sensory integration and coordination, learning, and memory. We review the various types of invaginating structures in the synapses and discuss their potential functions. We also present several new examples of invaginating structures from a variety of animals including Drosophila and mice, mainly using FIB-SEM, with which we trace the form and arrangement of these structures.
“…Thus, they are in different positions and with different combinations of glutamate receptors within the area of glutamate spillover diffusion; GABA and ephaptic conduction are probably also involved here ( Kramer and Davenport, 2015 ; Petralia et al, 2017 ). The main invaginating structures extend from bipolar and horizontal cells; their invagination and function are partly dependent on trans-synaptic complexes of proteins including calcium channel subunits and receptors ( Kerschensteiner, 2017 ; Wang et al, 2017 ; Cao et al, 2020 ; Maddox et al, 2020 ; Tsukamoto et al, 2021 ). Invaginating horizontal cell processes form a type of reciprocal synapse including a feed-forward function along with negative feedback to provide lateral inhibition to help the brain modulate signals from groups of adjacent photoreceptor cells.…”
Invaginating structures are common in the synapses of most animals. However, the details of these invaginating structures remain understudied in part because they are not well resolved in light microscopy and were often misidentified in early electron microscope (EM) studies. Utilizing experimental techniques along with the latest advances in microscopy, such as focused ion beam-scanning EM (FIB-SEM), evidence is gradually building to suggest that the synaptic invaginating structures contribute to synapse development, maintenance, and plasticity. These invaginating structures are most elaborate in synapses mediating rapid integration of signals, such as muscle contraction, mechanoreception, and vision. Here we argue that the synaptic invaginations should be considered in future studies seeking to understand their role in sensory integration and coordination, learning, and memory. We review the various types of invaginating structures in the synapses and discuss their potential functions. We also present several new examples of invaginating structures from a variety of animals including Drosophila and mice, mainly using FIB-SEM, with which we trace the form and arrangement of these structures.
“…Phenotypic differences in rod and cone phenotype have been found in different mouse models carrying mutations in the Ca V 1.4 channel complex. While some found that cones are spared 13 , 17 , 31 , 55 , 56 , other reported drastic changes compared to rods 14 , 27 . Still, a recent study showed that the Ca V 1.4.IT mutation can exert different functional phenotypes depending on splice variant and subunit composition 57 .…”
CaV1.4 L-type calcium channels are predominantly expressed in photoreceptor terminals playing a crucial role for synaptic transmission and, consequently, for vision. Human mutations in the encoding gene are associated with congenital stationary night blindness type-2. Besides rod-driven scotopic vision also cone-driven photopic responses are severely affected in patients. The present study therefore examined functional and morphological changes in cones and cone-related pathways in mice carrying the CaV1.4 gain-of function mutation I756T (CaV1.4-IT) using multielectrode array, patch-clamp and immunohistochemical analyses. CaV1.4-IT ganglion cell responses to photopic stimuli were seen only in a small fraction of cells indicative of a major impairment in the cone pathway. Though cone photoreceptors underwent morphological rearrangements, they retained their ability to release glutamate. Our functional data suggested a postsynaptic cone bipolar cell defect, supported by the fact that the majority of cone bipolar cells showed sprouting, while horizontal cells maintained contacts with cones and cone-to-horizontal cell input was preserved. Furthermore a reduction of basal Ca2+ influx by a calcium channel blocker was not sufficient to rescue synaptic transmission deficits caused by the CaV1.4-IT mutation. Long term treatments with low-dose Ca2+ channel blockers might however be beneficial reducing Ca2+ toxicity without major effects on ganglion cells responses.
“…Rod bipolar and horizontal cell neurites appose mature spherules in the OPL and ectopically in the ONL, but fail to invaginate into the spherules (Fig. 3C) (Maddox et al 2020). Although the cone phenotype of the G369i mice is still under investigation, these results suggest that while dispensable for the molecular organization of rod synapses, Cav1.4 Ca 2+ influx is required for their structural maturity and localization in the OPL.…”
Section: Cav14 Regulates the Maturation And Function Of Rod And Cone Synapsesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…2A-C). A role for Cav1.4 in mediating presynaptic Ca 2+ signals in mouse photoreceptors is further supported by the near elimination of depolarization-evoked Ca 2+ transients in the OPL (Mansergh et al 2005, Regus-Leidig et al 2014 and the lack of rod ICa in Cav1.4 knockout (KO) mice (Maddox et al 2020). Cav1.4 protein is tightly clustered along the base of the synaptic ribbon in rods and cones (Liu et al 2013b, Morgans 2001, and thus is well-positioned to regulate the exocytosis of glutamate.…”
Section: Cav14 Regulates the Maturation And Function Of Rod And Cone Synapsesmentioning
Voltage-gated Ca2+ (Cav) channels play pivotal roles in regulating gene transcription, neuronal excitability, and neurotransmitter release. In order to meet the spatial and temporal demands of visual signaling, Cav channels exhibit unusual properties in the retina compared to their counterparts in other areas of the nervous system. Here, we review current concepts regarding the specific subtypes of Cav channels expressed in the retina, their intrinsic properties and forms of modulation, and how their dysregulation could lead to retinal disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.