A dual privacy decision model for online social networks

Making Decisions about Self-Disclosure in Online Social Networks

“…Quantitative research has been used in most of the articles [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. An example of such study is [26], which showed that both relationship management and usefulness of Facebook (benefits) have positive effects, and privacy concerns (risks) have a negative impact on users' intentions to disclose personal information on Facebook.…”

“…Benefit: Convenience of maintaining existing relationships, New relationship building, Self-presentation, and Enjoyment [25] Information privacy management (dual privacy decision) in Facebook.…”

Can Privacy and Security Be Friends? A Cultural Framework to Differentiate Security and Privacy Behaviors on Online Social Networks

“…For example, individuals may disclose sensitive personal information motivated by various reasons, such as forming desirable impression through online self-presentation, socializing, expressing oneself to others, meeting social expectations, or pleasing others [26]. Due to such motivations, the extent of privacy behaviors can be influenced by how individuals perceive others view them based on the information they disclose on OSNs.…”

Exploring the Effects of the Privacy‐Handling Management Styles of Social Networking Sites on User Satisfaction: A Conflict Management Perspective

“…Self‐disclosure in an online community is defined as “what individuals voluntarily and intentionally reveal about themselves to others – including thoughts, feelings and experiences” (Posey, Lowry, Roberts, & Ellis, , p. 183). Self‐disclosure has been measured in multiple dimensions, including amount, depth, and duration (Wheeless & Grotz, ); honesty, intent, and valence (Posey et al., ); and information versus interaction management (James, Warkentin, & Collignon, ; James, Nottingham, Collignon, Warkentin, & Ziegelmayer, ). It has also been measured in a single dimension in terms of a continuum of values of disclosing less or more personal information (Chen, ; Zlatolas, Welzer, Heričko, & Hölbl, ).…”

“…For example, James et al. () and James et al. () empirically showed that Facebook users not only expected to have the right to control what information they shared or disclosed but also believed they should have the right to control with whom they shared the information in their interactions with others.…”