2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68195-5_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dual-Modal CT/US Kidney Phantom Model for Image-Guided Percutaneous Renal Access

Abstract: Percutaneous renal access (PRA) is a crucial step in some minimally invasive kidney interventions. During this step, the surgeon inserts a needle through the skin until the kidney target site using fluoroscopy and ultrasound imaging. Recently, new concepts of enhanced image-guided interventions have been introduced in these interventions. However, their validation remains a challenging task. Phantom models have been presented to solve such challenge, using realistic anatomies in a controlled environment. In th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that FMs are visible as brighter and darker structures in the US and CT images, respectively. Twelve FMs were selected to align both US and CT images, while the remaining ones were used to assess the registration performance $. The selected FMs were rigidly aligned based on the strategy presented by Horn et al …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that FMs are visible as brighter and darker structures in the US and CT images, respectively. Twelve FMs were selected to align both US and CT images, while the remaining ones were used to assess the registration performance $. The selected FMs were rigidly aligned based on the strategy presented by Horn et al …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phantoms were constructed using the protocol presented in Gomes‐Fonseca et al . In short, the phantom was manufactured based on a porcine kidney combined with tissue mimicking material (TMM) and implanted fiducial markers (FMs), see Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%