2016
DOI: 10.3390/s16121988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dual Frequency Carrier Phase Error Difference Checking Algorithm for the GNSS Compass

Abstract: The performance of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) compass is related to the quality of carrier phase measurement. How to process the carrier phase error properly is important to improve the GNSS compass accuracy. In this work, we propose a dual frequency carrier phase error difference checking algorithm for the GNSS compass. The algorithm aims at eliminating large carrier phase error in dual frequency double differenced carrier phase measurement according to the error difference between two freq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where 1 compares the propagation of measurement noise in this proposed linear combination to the MW combination for GPS with 0.1 m σ P 1.5 m and carrier phase std of 0.002 m (left) and 0.02 m (right). This range of std values depicts measurement quality during low-to high-multipath conditions as reported in Liu et al (2016) and Ray et al (1999). As shown in table 1 and figure 1, the improvements in std when using the proposed combination over MW are 6.7% for L1-L2, 12.7% for L1-L5 and 0.7% for L2-L5.…”
Section: Gnssmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…where 1 compares the propagation of measurement noise in this proposed linear combination to the MW combination for GPS with 0.1 m σ P 1.5 m and carrier phase std of 0.002 m (left) and 0.02 m (right). This range of std values depicts measurement quality during low-to high-multipath conditions as reported in Liu et al (2016) and Ray et al (1999). As shown in table 1 and figure 1, the improvements in std when using the proposed combination over MW are 6.7% for L1-L2, 12.7% for L1-L5 and 0.7% for L2-L5.…”
Section: Gnssmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Besides, multiple GNSS receivers can be installed onboard to enhance vehicle positioning [ 5 , 7 ]. In addition, a GNSS compass with two antennas can be employed to obtain heading [ 8 , 9 ]. Moreover, by differencing over time the GNSS measurements taken in motion, speed estimations [ 10 ] as well as pitch and heading [ 11 ] can be deduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%