2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2017.526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dual Ascent Framework for Lagrangean Decomposition of Combinatorial Problems

Abstract: We propose a general dual ascent framework for Lagrangean decomposition of combinatorial problems. Although methods of this type have shown their efficiency for a number of problems, so far there was no general algorithm applicable to multiple problem types. In this work, we propose such a general algorithm. It depends on several parameters, which can be used to optimize its performance in each particular setting. We demonstrate efficacy of our method on graph matching and multicut problems, where it outperfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, for solving QAPs in practice, existing approaches either resort to (expensive) branch and bound methods [6], or to approximations, e.g. based on spectral methods [35,18], dual decomposition [57], linear relaxations [54,55], convex relaxations [71,46,23,22,30,1,21,7], path following [70,72,29], or alternating directions [33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, for solving QAPs in practice, existing approaches either resort to (expensive) branch and bound methods [6], or to approximations, e.g. based on spectral methods [35,18], dual decomposition [57], linear relaxations [54,55], convex relaxations [71,46,23,22,30,1,21,7], path following [70,72,29], or alternating directions [33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we will first present the multi-graph matching problem with quadratic costs. Next, we review the Lagrange decomposition framework [34] and show how it can be applied to decompose the MGM into efficiently solvable subproblems. We also review the message passing algorithm from [34] for general decompositions and detail how our MGM decomposition can be optimized by this method.…”
Section: Lagrangian Mgm Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we define a general algorithm for IRPS-LP problems (5), which is applicable to the decompositions (R1)-(R5) of the graph matching problem considered in Section 3.1. Our algorithm is a simplified version of the algorithm [49], where we fixed several parameters to the values common to the relaxations (R1)-(R5).…”
Section: General Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Algorithm 2 reparametrizes the problem by Procedure 1 only and the latter is guaranteed to not decrease the dual, so is Algorithm 2. We refer to [49] for further theoretical properties of Algorithm 2.…”
Section: Dualmentioning
confidence: 99%