2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A droplet transport model for channel and pipe flow based on particle kinetic theory and a stress–ω turbulence model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Algebraic relations between the particle and fluid stresses, including the stress redistribution terms can then be invoked, eliminating the need for stress boundary conditions. Only for larger particle/fluid density ratios are stress boundary conditions necessary (such as droplets in gas modelled by Skartlien, 2009, or solid particles in gas).…”
Section: Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Algebraic relations between the particle and fluid stresses, including the stress redistribution terms can then be invoked, eliminating the need for stress boundary conditions. Only for larger particle/fluid density ratios are stress boundary conditions necessary (such as droplets in gas modelled by Skartlien, 2009, or solid particles in gas).…”
Section: Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another timescale that is frequently used is the eddy turnover time defined by the scalar diffusivity. Skartlien ( , 2009 showed that the wall normal particle diffusivity for vanishing Stokes number, and for drag only, limits to ð yy Þ h ¼ hu 0 y u 0 y is when the locally homogeneous form of the dispersion tensor k yy is invoked. If we impose consistency between the eddy diffusivity and the wall normal particle diffusivity for vanishing relaxation time, we obtain the following eddy turnover time:…”
Section: Fluid Timescales Compared To S Ddmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations