A Driving Force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) tool to help waste pickers' cooperatives self-evaluate their environmental and economic performance

Brunhara, Jéssica Patrícia Corrêa; Macedo, Karla Gonçalves; Das, Tapas K.; Innocentini, M. D. M.

doi:10.1016/j.heha.2023.100054

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In contrast, the government’s mandated environmental monitoring and financial investments in technology were deemed ineffective in reducing SO 2 emissions. Brunhara et al [ 17 ] employed the DPISR model to develop an indicator system of 16 driver indicators (D), 74 pressure indicators (P), 23 state indicators (S), 35 impact indicators (I), and 38 response indicators (R) to help a cooperative of waste pickers in Brazil self-assess its social, environmental, and economic performance and to facilitate the cooperative’s proposal of highly targeted improvements. Kim et al [ 18 ] In order to achieve effective, efficient and equitable global fire governance, the DPSIR framework is used to construct fire-related issues to establish a coherent causal path among drivers (D), pressures (P), states (S), effects (I) and responses (R).…”

Section: The Dpsir Model and Sustainability In Sportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing an evaluation model for the comprehensive level of sustainable development of provincial competitive sports in China based on DPSIR and MCDM

Xu,

Lin,

Qiu

2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study focuses on the objective assessment of sport development in socio-economic environments, considering the challenges faced by the industry. These challenges include disparities in regional investments, limited market participation, slow progress towards sports professionalization, and insufficient technological innovations. To tackle these challenges, we suggest implementing an integrated evaluation model that follows the DPSIR (Drivers, Pressures, States, Impacts, Responses) framework and incorporates comprehensive socioeconomic indicators. Subsequently, we utilized the Entropy power method and TOPSIS (Order Preference Technique for Similarity to an Ideal Solution, TOPSIS) analysis to comprehensively assess the progress of competitive sports development in 31 provinces and cities in China. Additionally, we recommended further developments in competitive sports and proposed precise strategies for promoting its growth. The framework and methodology developed in this paper provide an objective and scientifically based set of decision-making guidelines that can be adopted by government agencies and related industries in order to create successful plans that promote the sustainable growth of competitive sport. This is expected to bolster the nation’s global influence, enhance social unity, and fuel economic expansion. The findings of this study offer policymakers valuable insights regarding competitive sports and can advance the development of the sports sector in China, thus making it a crucial driver of regional socio-economic progress.

show abstract

Section: The Dpsir Model and Sustainability In Sportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing an evaluation model for the comprehensive level of sustainable development of provincial competitive sports in China based on DPSIR and MCDM

Xu,

Lin,

Qiu

2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this study, the framework chosen for performing the environmental evaluation was the DPSIR approach. The goal of the DPSIR framework is to provide a comprehensive description of a system through the use of appropriate indicators [51]. This tool has been widely employed in sustainability and environmental studies [51][52][53][54].…”

Section: Evaluation Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The goal of the DPSIR framework is to provide a comprehensive description of a system through the use of appropriate indicators [51]. This tool has been widely employed in sustainability and environmental studies [51][52][53][54]. It was developed by the European Environment Agency (EEA) in the late 1990s which optimizes the DSR (Driving force-State-Response) and PSR (Pressure-State-Response) models.…”

Section: Evaluation Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In summary, the analysis of sustainability indicators' performance revealed that 7 of the data published by national institutions could be classified as useful for w In summary, the analysis of sustainability indicators' performance revealed that 70% of the data published by national institutions could be classified as useful for waste management according to the criteria outlined by EEA [59]. However, a limitation of the DPSIR framework is the lack of a direct and automatic correlation between its components, necessitating manual evaluation, which can be inefficient, subjective, and complex [51]. Another challenge in our study was the limited availability of reliable waste data for assessing various indicators.…”

Section: Sustainability Indicators In Waste Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sustainability Indicators Model Applied to Waste Management in Brazil Using the DPSIR Framework

Santos,

Fonseca,

Santiago

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Municipal solid waste is a chronic problem in many developing countries like Brazil. Addressing the challenges of waste management requires robust frameworks for assessing the policies’ impacts. In this context, sustainability indicators may help decision-makers in adopting more efficient waste policies. The main goal of this study is to propose a framework for identifying and classifying indicators related to waste management within Brazilian public policies. This evaluation was based on extensive legislative surveys aimed at identifying goals, targets, and obligations outlined in these policies. A comprehensive Driving Force–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework was employed to identify and classify the usefulness of these indicators in the context of waste management. A total of 151 indicators were identified, alongside 283 waste goals, targets, and obligations, which were primarily related to municipal waste and were mostly sourced from plans, laws, presidential decrees, and collegiate resolutions. Within the framework, 66 indicators, mostly related to waste collection and recycling, were deemed useful, comprising 34 classified as Responses, 14 as Pressures, six as Driving Forces, four as States, two as Impacts, and six as Pressure/Responses. The challenges associated with the DPSIR framework and strategies to enhance the efficiency of public waste policies in Brazil are also discussed.

show abstract

DPSIR framework to evaluate and analyze Iran's energy security

Esmaeili,

Almassi,

Ghahderijani

2024

Discov Appl Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Energy security has become an increasing concern for many countries, policymakers, and decision-makers. Beyond the environmental challenges of fossil energy sources, energy security remains a prominent concern for economic development. Therefore, evaluating energy security can be a valuable tool for policy formulation. This article models the energy security of Iran using the DPSIR framework (driving forces, pressures, states, impacts, and responses). The period under study is from 2012 to 2021. The dimensions of this framework include five aspects: driving forces, pressures, status, impacts, and responses. The TOPSIS model with entropy weighting is used to calculate the weights of indices and ultimately determine the final energy security. The research findings indicate that throughout the examined period, there have been fluctuations in the trend. However, Iran's energy security has been bullish and has reached 0.61 in 2021 from 0.38 in 2012. The indicators of driving forces and impacts have enhanced energy security threats. International sanctions, population growth, urbanization, reliance on fossil fuel consumption, and the emission of environmental pollutants were the most influential factors contributing to decreased energy security. Iran requires the implementation of suitable strategies for long-term control of these factors.

show abstract

A Driving Force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) tool to help waste pickers' cooperatives self-evaluate their environmental and economic performance

Cited by 5 publications

References 20 publications

Constructing an evaluation model for the comprehensive level of sustainable development of provincial competitive sports in China based on DPSIR and MCDM

Constructing an evaluation model for the comprehensive level of sustainable development of provincial competitive sports in China based on DPSIR and MCDM

Sustainability Indicators Model Applied to Waste Management in Brazil Using the DPSIR Framework

DPSIR framework to evaluate and analyze Iran's energy security

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About