2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A doubly optimal ellipse fit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we expound this principle in detail and modify renormalization so that it outperforms the standard reprojection error minimization. Doing a precise high order error analysis using the perturbation technique of Kanatani [11] and Al-Sharadqah and Chernov [1], we derive a formula that maximizes the accuracy of the solution; we call it hyper-renormalization. Partly, this has already been done in the single constraint case, such as ellipse fitting, by Kanatani et al [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we expound this principle in detail and modify renormalization so that it outperforms the standard reprojection error minimization. Doing a precise high order error analysis using the perturbation technique of Kanatani [11] and Al-Sharadqah and Chernov [1], we derive a formula that maximizes the accuracy of the solution; we call it hyper-renormalization. Partly, this has already been done in the single constraint case, such as ellipse fitting, by Kanatani et al [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best known approach is maximum likelihood (ML), which minimizes the negative log-likelihood l = − N α=1 log p θ (x α ). Recently, an alternative approach is more 1 Professor Emeritus, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan alsharadqaha@ecu.edu c) sugaya@iim.cs.tut.ac.jp and more in use: one directly solves specified equations, called estimating equations [5], in the form of g(x 1 , . .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the authors noted in their original work, the method suffered from substantial bias problems. Other algebraic fitting methods have focused on minimizing the bias, but no longer guaranteed that the resulting estimate will be an ellipse [2,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halif et al [13] provided improvements towards numerical stability. Newer ellipse fitting methods proved to achieve higher accuracies [3,16,17,20,29,34]. Nevertheless, most of these approaches do not guarantee that the final result is an ellipse, rather hyperbolas or parabolas might occur.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our constrained ellipse fitting approach is based on the Fitzgibbon method because it is the only method that always guarantees an ellipse fit in a non-iterative and therefore fast way. Other methods which proved to be superior in accuracy in free conic fitting require a post hoc procedure to ensure an ellipse fit [3,17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%