2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01337-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A double-masked randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of unoprostone with timolol and betaxolol in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma including pseudoexfoliation glaucoma or ocular hypertension. 6 month data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study there were no clinically relevant changes in pulmonary function and cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure and heart rate), consistent with other trials conducted with unoprostone [19, 30, 31, 32]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study there were no clinically relevant changes in pulmonary function and cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure and heart rate), consistent with other trials conducted with unoprostone [19, 30, 31, 32]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The mild burning and stinging sensations that occurred after use of unoprostone 0.15% were transient and have previously been reported [19]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the comparative trial of unoprostone, timolol, and betaxolol by Nordmann et al discussed in the Unoprostone as monotherapy section, adverse events were similar for the three treatment groups except for burning/stinging, burning/stinging upon drug instillation, and ocular itching, which were more common with unoprostone than with timolol but less common than with betaxolol 60. Hyperemia was also more common with unoprostone (10.8%) than with timolol (3.6%) or betaxolol (5.0%).…”
Section: Safety and Tolerabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Following one month of therapy, both agents produced significant reductions in IOP and increases in pulsatile ocular blood flow, although the changes seen with latanoprost were nearly two-fold greater than those seen with unoprostone, which was statistically significant. Although some studies have found equivalent IOP reduction between timolol and unoprostone,48–50 Nordmann et al in a 24-month multicenter, double-masked, randomized trial of 556 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension who received either twice-daily unoprostone, betaxolol, or timolol for 6 months, found similar mean diurnal IOP-lowering efficacy between betaxolol and unoprostone monotherapy 60. Both groups achieved an IOP reduction of 3–4 mmHg, or 18%–20%, from baseline.…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 98%