1982
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.66.3.574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A double-blind randomized trial of propranolol and verapamil in the treatment of effort angina.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a wide inter-and intraindividual variation in plasma concentrations of verapamil, with a range which resembled that reported in other studies.8 17 pamil concentrations in patients with coronary heart disease. We observed a modest rise in mean plasma concentrations of verapamil and nor-verapamil during combination treatment, which was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We observed a wide inter-and intraindividual variation in plasma concentrations of verapamil, with a range which resembled that reported in other studies.8 17 pamil concentrations in patients with coronary heart disease. We observed a modest rise in mean plasma concentrations of verapamil and nor-verapamil during combination treatment, which was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It appeared that verapamil 360 mg/day was equiactive to propranolol 300 mg/day (Sandler et al, 1968; Livesley et al, 1973; Johnson et al, 1981; Leon et al, 1981; Frishman et al, 1982; Sadick et al, 1982; Tan et al, 1982; Findlay et al, 1987). Since there is a dose-dependency for both agents, it is obvious that the superiority of one agent against the other cannot be estimated by comparing a single dose of each drug.…”
Section: Key Information About Clinical Usefulness Of Ccbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since exercise capacity is increased with 0-blockade, ST response may be observed at a later stage of exercise with decreased (Beller et al, 1984;Jennings et al, 1980;Sadick et al, 1982;Thadani and Parker, 1979) or unchanged (Frishman et al, 1982) magnitude of ST deviation. @blockade has also been claimed to eliminate false positive responses without a decrease in true negative EECGs (Marcomichelakis et al, 1980).…”
Section: Effect Of Digitalis and 0-blockade On Eecgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion of these subjects from the series will lead to selective patient material, evidently excluding the most severely symptomatic individuals. It is still controversial as to what extent digoxin (Adair et al, 1972;Bartel et al, 1974;Bermen et al, 1978;Frick et al, 1972;Kawai and Hultgren, 1964 Chaitman et al, 1984;Frishman et al, 1982;Gianelly et al, 1969;Jennings et al, 1980;Marcomichelakis et al, 1980;Sadick et al, 1982;Thadani and Parker, 1979), or concurrent use of these drugs (Frick et al, 1972;LeWinter et al, 1977) modify the exercise electrocardiographic (EECG) response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%