2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.01.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Double-Blind Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Therapy on Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A small randomized double-blind, shamcontrolled study in 30 postmenopausal women did not demonstrate a difference in vaginal symptoms, sexual function, or urinary symptoms between the treatment arm (n = 14) and the sham-controlled arm (n = 16). However, the study was likely underpowered due to its small sample size [49]. Another recently published sham-controlled randomized trial of 85 postmenopausal women, 50% of whom had a history of breast cancer, also showed no improvement in vaginal symptoms with laser treatment compared to sham treatment with 12 months follow-up [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A small randomized double-blind, shamcontrolled study in 30 postmenopausal women did not demonstrate a difference in vaginal symptoms, sexual function, or urinary symptoms between the treatment arm (n = 14) and the sham-controlled arm (n = 16). However, the study was likely underpowered due to its small sample size [49]. Another recently published sham-controlled randomized trial of 85 postmenopausal women, 50% of whom had a history of breast cancer, also showed no improvement in vaginal symptoms with laser treatment compared to sham treatment with 12 months follow-up [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar to vaginal estrogen treatment, vaginal laser treatment has been shown to increase the thickness of vaginal epithelium and improve the quality of the vaginal mucosa [14]. However, there is still limited prospective data with long-term follow-up and there are some studies which failed to show an improvement with laser treatment [49,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end it is important to noticed that the latest works confirm the safety and efficiency of CO2 laser treatment in genitourinary syndrome are randomized trials with good quality data [27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one small RCT has been conducted with fractional CO 2 therapy in breast and gynecologic cancer survivors, and it appeared to change vaginal symptoms, including improvement of sexual function 51 . Larger RCTs in cancer patients are needed to confirm these beneficial results, particularly since this is a minimally invasive procedure ideally performed by an experienced gynecologist, 84 and recent double-blind RCTs have not found benefit in healthy postmenopausal women 85,86 . It should be noted that currently, the utilization of laser has not been fully approved by FDA to treat any gynecologic problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 Larger RCTs in cancer patients are needed to confirm these beneficial results, particularly since this is a minimally invasive procedure ideally performed by an experienced gynecologist, 84 and recent double-blind RCTs have not found benefit in healthy postmenopausal women. 85,86 It should be noted that currently, the utilization of laser has not been fully approved by FDA to treat any gynecologic problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%