1977
DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(77)90084-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A double-blind evaluation of the use of nebulized metaproterenol and isoproterenol in hospitalized asthmatic children and adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only episodes that were consistent with diagnoses of asthma, wheezing associated with respiratory illness, or bronchiolitis were included in the study.1318 Specific criteria for exclusion were as follows: (1) bronchodilator or ste¬ roid therapy within the previous 48 hours; (2) respiratory distress secondary to chronic cardiopulmonary problems; (3) a history of prematurity (<37 weeks' gestation); (4) respiratory difficulty in the neonatal period; (5) heart rate greater than or equal to 200 beats per minute or respirations greater than or equal to 100/min; and (6) requirement for immediate ventilatory support (eg, endotracheal tube placement). Children aged 1 to 36 months who pre¬ sented to our outpatient facilities with acute episodes of wheez¬ ing or respiratory distress, present for less than 48 hours, were eligible to participate.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only episodes that were consistent with diagnoses of asthma, wheezing associated with respiratory illness, or bronchiolitis were included in the study.1318 Specific criteria for exclusion were as follows: (1) bronchodilator or ste¬ roid therapy within the previous 48 hours; (2) respiratory distress secondary to chronic cardiopulmonary problems; (3) a history of prematurity (<37 weeks' gestation); (4) respiratory difficulty in the neonatal period; (5) heart rate greater than or equal to 200 beats per minute or respirations greater than or equal to 100/min; and (6) requirement for immediate ventilatory support (eg, endotracheal tube placement). Children aged 1 to 36 months who pre¬ sented to our outpatient facilities with acute episodes of wheez¬ ing or respiratory distress, present for less than 48 hours, were eligible to participate.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven agreed to be interviewed, 1 deferred to a colleague, and 3 who did not agree were replaced. The final group of 21 included 10 pediatrie allergist-immunolo¬ gists (1 primarily a pharmacologist and 1 a clinical immunologist), 9 pulmonologists, and 2 pediatricians who were board-certified in both allergy-immunology and pediatrie pul¬ monology.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%