1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00155-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dose-controlled study of 153Sm-Ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonate (EDTMP) in the treatment of patients with painful bone metastase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
0
9

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
89
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…After injection of 153Sm-EDTMP, response was recognized in 90.3% prostate cancer and 97.9% of breast cancer patients, a total of 7/110 prostate and breast cancer patients did not respond to therapy. As compared with other studies showed 40 to 85.5% response rates in cancer breast and 70 to 80% response rate in cancer prostate [16][17][18], we reported insignificant difference in therapeutic response rate between prostate and breast cancer (90.5% and 97.8% respectively), this finding also recorded by Tripathi et al as well as Baczyk et al who did not show any significant difference in response rate among prostate and breast cancer patients (80.6% and 80.4%) respectively [11,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…After injection of 153Sm-EDTMP, response was recognized in 90.3% prostate cancer and 97.9% of breast cancer patients, a total of 7/110 prostate and breast cancer patients did not respond to therapy. As compared with other studies showed 40 to 85.5% response rates in cancer breast and 70 to 80% response rate in cancer prostate [16][17][18], we reported insignificant difference in therapeutic response rate between prostate and breast cancer (90.5% and 97.8% respectively), this finding also recorded by Tripathi et al as well as Baczyk et al who did not show any significant difference in response rate among prostate and breast cancer patients (80.6% and 80.4%) respectively [11,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Sm has a wide therapeutic scale and dose-finding studies have shown that doses up to 111 MBq/kg are safe, but associated with an increased number of episodes of reversible hematological events [15]. What is interesting that in our study EBRT in dose range from 8 Gy to 20 Gy didn't influenced the level of hematological toxicities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…10,11,23 With this activity, various authors describe the radiation absorbed dose in the marrow to be between 230 and 590 cGy 16,18,21,24 (a range that includes the results of this study, ie, 347 ± 65 cGy). Administration of doses above 1 mCi/kg seems not to lead to better pain control, 9 even though it results in higher marrow toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Grade III toxicity is described in approximately 10% of the patients treated with doses of 1 mCi/kg, 9,10,11,12 and grade IV toxicity occurs in less than 1% of cases. In addition to betaparticle emission (energy = 810 keV), samarium-153 emits gamma radiation (energy = 103 keV), which may be used for biodistribution and dosimetric measures.…”
Section: Sistema úNico De Saúde)mentioning
confidence: 99%