Abstract:SUMMARY1. Nicotine evokes the release of catecholamines from perfused cat adrenal glands in a concentration-dependent manner, the median effective concentration for nicotine being 5 /tM. Two 2 min pulses of 5 pM-nicotine, 40 min apart (S. and S,) gave net catecholamine outputs of 7-64 and 3-55 jug/8 min, respectively. The ratio S2/S1 in control glands was 0-5.2. Increasing concentrations of apomorphine (1-10 /tM) markedly inhibited catecholamine release during the second nicotine pulse (A2). At 1 /tM-apomorphi… Show more
“…The presence of dopamine D 2 receptors has been shown in the adrenal medulla and administration of D 2 receptor agonists reduced catecholamine secretion induced by nicotine activation (Artalejo et al 1985, Gonzales et al 1986. Therefore, the D 2 agonist inhibition of catecholamine secretion by the adrenal medulla should have facilitated the higher insulin response in bromocriptine-treated rats submitted to i.v.…”
Neurocytoglucopenia has been reported to increase both parasympathetic and sympathetic tone with a predominant effect on the latter, which accounts for the major effect of plasma hyperglycemia and the inhibition of insulin secretion. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of chronic treatment with bromocriptine (0·4 mg/100 g body wt per day), a potent sympatholytic D 2 -dopaminergic agonist, on hyperglycemia and insulin secretion in response to neurocytoglucopenia induced by 2-deoxy--glucose (2DG). After 2 weeks of bromocriptine treatment the animals, freely moving in their cages, were submitted to 2DG administration (50 mg/100 g body wt) via atrial catheter infusion. After 2DG infusion, the plasma prolactin of vehicle-treated (VEH) rats increased rapidly, reaching a peak at 10 min (34·3 7·6 ng/ ml; P<0·01). In contrast, 2DG infusion failed to induce any significant change in the plasma prolactin levels of bromocriptine-treated (BR) rats. BR rats showed higher resting glucose levels than control rats (8·2 0·28 mM (BR) vs 6·0 0·18 mM (VEH); P<0·01). However, the hyperglycemic response of BR rats to 2DG injection was 30% lower than that of VEH rats (P<0·05). BR rats also showed a rapid rise in plasma insulin levels reaching a peak at 30 min after 2DG injection (243% higher than basal values; P<0·01). This increased rise in the insulin response to neurocytoglucopenia of BR rats was blocked by previous intravenous injection of atropine methyl nitrate (0·2 mg/100 g body wt).The present results suggest that chronic treatment with bromocriptine determines a strong increase in the parasympathetic tone response to neurocytoglucopenia, which is responsible for the higher stimulation of insulin secretion observed in BR rats. The data also provide further evidence that D 2 -dopaminergic agonist can block neurocytoglucopenia-induced prolactin release.
“…The presence of dopamine D 2 receptors has been shown in the adrenal medulla and administration of D 2 receptor agonists reduced catecholamine secretion induced by nicotine activation (Artalejo et al 1985, Gonzales et al 1986. Therefore, the D 2 agonist inhibition of catecholamine secretion by the adrenal medulla should have facilitated the higher insulin response in bromocriptine-treated rats submitted to i.v.…”
Neurocytoglucopenia has been reported to increase both parasympathetic and sympathetic tone with a predominant effect on the latter, which accounts for the major effect of plasma hyperglycemia and the inhibition of insulin secretion. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of chronic treatment with bromocriptine (0·4 mg/100 g body wt per day), a potent sympatholytic D 2 -dopaminergic agonist, on hyperglycemia and insulin secretion in response to neurocytoglucopenia induced by 2-deoxy--glucose (2DG). After 2 weeks of bromocriptine treatment the animals, freely moving in their cages, were submitted to 2DG administration (50 mg/100 g body wt) via atrial catheter infusion. After 2DG infusion, the plasma prolactin of vehicle-treated (VEH) rats increased rapidly, reaching a peak at 10 min (34·3 7·6 ng/ ml; P<0·01). In contrast, 2DG infusion failed to induce any significant change in the plasma prolactin levels of bromocriptine-treated (BR) rats. BR rats showed higher resting glucose levels than control rats (8·2 0·28 mM (BR) vs 6·0 0·18 mM (VEH); P<0·01). However, the hyperglycemic response of BR rats to 2DG injection was 30% lower than that of VEH rats (P<0·05). BR rats also showed a rapid rise in plasma insulin levels reaching a peak at 30 min after 2DG injection (243% higher than basal values; P<0·01). This increased rise in the insulin response to neurocytoglucopenia of BR rats was blocked by previous intravenous injection of atropine methyl nitrate (0·2 mg/100 g body wt).The present results suggest that chronic treatment with bromocriptine determines a strong increase in the parasympathetic tone response to neurocytoglucopenia, which is responsible for the higher stimulation of insulin secretion observed in BR rats. The data also provide further evidence that D 2 -dopaminergic agonist can block neurocytoglucopenia-induced prolactin release.
“…Thus any hormone, neurotransmitter or drug that raises cyclic AMP may activate facilitation including dopamine , VIP (Wilson, 1988), adenosine (Chern, Kim, Slakey & Westhead, 1988) and forskolin (Marriott, Adams & Boarder, 1988;Morita, Dohi, Kitayama, Koyama & Tsujimoto, 1987). Thus when VIP is released from the pre-synaptic nerve terminals of the splanchnic nerve (Haycock, Shukla, Wakade & Wakade, 1990) or dopamine is secreted from chromaffin cells in response to depolarizations (Artalejo, Garcia, Montiel & Sanchez, 1985) their primary effect may be to augment catecholamine release from chromaffin cells by the activation of facilitation Ca2+ channels. It will be of considerable interest to determine whether any of the substances secreted by chromaffin cells including noradrenaline, adrenaline and ATP act as negative feedback controllers to curtail catecholamine secretion.…”
SUMMARY1. Cell-attached patch recordings from bovine chromaffin cells were performed with 90 mM-Ba2`in the patch pipette and with isotonic potassium aspartate in the bathing solution to zero the membrane potential. Three different types of unitary Ca2l channel activity could be distinguished in these recordings.2. A 27 pS Ca2" channel was distinguished by constructing amplitude histograms and measuring slope conductance. This channel activated over a broad range of potentials (depolarizations > -10 mV).3. A second Ca2" channel with a slope conductance of 14 pS could also be detected with amplitude histograms. This channel activated with depolarizations > -20 mV.4. An 18 pS Ca2+ channel was observed infrequently indicating that this channel may carry only a small amount of the whole-cell current. This 18 pS channel was sensitive to changes in holding potential. Depolarizing the patch to + 10 mV from a holding potential of -80 mV elicited robust unitary activity. Changing the patch holding potential to -40 mV while maintaining test depolarizations to +1O mV completely inactivated the 18 pS channel. Neither the 25 pS nor the 14 pS Ca2+ channels were affected by changes in holding potential in the range from -80 mV to -40 mV, indicating the 18 pS channel was a different type of channel. As the 18 pS channel was observed so infrequently, no detailed studies of it were possible. 5. Chromaffin cell Ca2+ currents exhibited facilitation. Large pre-depolarizations greatly augmented whole-cell currents observed in these cells. Whole-cell currents could double or triple after recruiting facilitation. The application of large predepolarizations altered the gating behaviour of the 27 pS Ca2+ channel manifested as dramatically increased channel opening probabilities measured during subsequent test pulses. Large pre-depolarizations induced unitary activity in the 27 pS Ca21 channel similar to the long-lived openings exhibited by L-type Ca2+ channels in the § To whom correspondence should be addressed. 6. Repetitive depolarizations in the physiological range could also induce facilitation. At the single-channel level facilitation was manifested as a striking increase in opening probability of the 27 pS Ca2+ channel. No effect of repetitive activity was observed on 14 pS channel gating. At the whole-cell level, repetitive depolarizations dramatically increased the current observed.7. Facilitation of 27 pS Ca2+ channel activity could be induced by changing the holding potential to a depolarized level (>-10 mV).8. Of the two relatively common kinds of Ca2+channels in chromaffin cells (27 and 14 pS), only the 27 pS channel was sensitive to dihydropyridines. The dihy-
“…The reversal of the inhibitory effects of dopamine agonists on catecholamine release by specific D2 antagonists such as sulpiride indicates that the D2 receptor subtype is responsible, both in the adrenal gland (Artalejo et al 1985;Gonzalez et al 1986) and in cultured chromaffin cells (Bigornia et al 1988). To date, there is no evidence for D1 receptors in the adrenal medulla and D1 agonists do not inhibit catecholamine release nor do D1 antagonists prevent the inhibitory effect of apomorphine (Bigornia et al 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dopaminergic agonists were shown to inhibit secretion of adrenaline and noradrenaline from perfused adrenal glands (Artalejo, Garcia, Montiel & Sanchez-Garcia, 1985; Gonzalez, Artalejo, Montiel, Hervas & Garcia, 1986) and from chromaffin cells maintained in primary culture (Bigornia, Suozzo, Ryan, Napp & Schneider, 1988). The reversal of the inhibitory effects of dopamine by specific D2 antagonists suggests that the effects are mediated by a D2 receptor in the adrenal medulla and the presence of D2 but not D1 dopamine receptors was demonstrated in ligand binding studies on chromaffin cell membrane suspensions (Gonzales et al 1986;Lyon, Titeler, Bigornia & Schneider, 1987;Quick, Bergeron, Mount & Philie, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While earlier work demonstrated that dopamine inhibited nicotinic-evoked catecholamine release (Artalejo et al 1985), more recent data suggest that dopamine decreases secretion from adrenal chromaffin cells by altering Ca2+ channel conductance (Bigornia et al 1988). To assess the possible role of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and of acetylcholine-activated channels in the dopamine-induced inhibition of catecholamine release, we have compared the effect of D2 agonists on Ca2+ and Na+ uptake evoked by different secretagogues.…”
SUMMARY1. Catecholamine secretion from cultured bovine adrenal chromaffin cells was decreased in a dose-dependent manner by the D2 dopamine agonists apomorphine and LY 17 1555.2. 45Ca2+ uptake was similarly inhibited and whole-cell Ca2+ currents were reduced by apomorphine.3. These inhibitory effects of D2 agonists depended on the secretagogue used, being much more pronounced for nicotine-evoked responses compared to high K+ stimulation, indicating another possible site of action of apomorphine up-stream of Ca2+ entry.4. Inhibition by apomorphine of nicotine-evoked responses could not be explained by competitive antagonism against nicotine or DMPP (1,1-dimethyl-4-phenylpiperazinium iodide).5. Apomorphine caused reductions of inward whole-cell nicotinic current evoked by ACh and nicotine.6. Inhibition of nicotine-evoked secretion and 22Na+ influx by apomorphine were not affected by tetrodotoxin, and voltage-dependent, whole-cell Na+ currents were unaltered by apomorphine.7. No evidence was obtained for increases in K+ conductance by apomorphine. 8. Action potentials recorded in whole-cell current clamp were blocked by apomorphine when they were triggered by nicotinic depolarization but not when they were elicited by direct electrical stimulation.9. Inclusion ofGDP-,-S in the pipette internal solution did not affect apomorphinedependent inhibition of nicotinic-evoked responses, while the decrease in whole-cell Ca2`current induced by apomorphine was completely inhibited in the presence of GDP-fl-S.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.