2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dominance tree and its application in evolutionary multi-objective optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature on SMOOPs and DSOOPs has been greatly expanding with evolutionary algorithms being one of the most popular approaches [11,23,31,39] for solving practical problems. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms can find a set of Pareto optimal solutions (POS) instead of a single optimal solution in a single simulation run [10,30,32,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on SMOOPs and DSOOPs has been greatly expanding with evolutionary algorithms being one of the most popular approaches [11,23,31,39] for solving practical problems. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms can find a set of Pareto optimal solutions (POS) instead of a single optimal solution in a single simulation run [10,30,32,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of multi-objective optimization algorithms (MOEAs), such as SPEA [52], SPEA2 [54], PAES [30], NSGA-II [13], IBEA [55], MSOPS [25], SMS-EMOA [16,2], MOEA/D [49,50] and MDMOEA [56], have been proposed and successfully applied to a number of real-world multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). In addition, independent strategies have also been proposed to improve the efficiencies of MOEAs [17,45,48,6,37,46]. However, the theoretical foundations of this area are still very weak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%