Almost twenty years ago I edited and contributed to a book entitled 'Enabling Inclusion: Blue skies…dark clouds?' (O'Brien, 2001a). The book contained a variety of chapters that raised issues about inclusion confusion especially in relation to rights, entitlements, ethics, systems, processes, pedagogy, ideologies and models. All contributors were concerned that the blue-sky thinking that surrounded inclusion at that time required a more critical debate in relation to the meaning of inclusion in education and how we could make it work. Emerging contradictions, tensions, concerns and dilemmas were identified so that they could be confronted and tackled before they became even more problematic as time went on. So, where are we now and how do I see it?Education for all: how can it happen?To understand where we are now in the UK, it is important to take a look at where we used to be. I will select a few key moments. Firstly, it is important to highlight that there was a time when some children were the responsibility of the National Health Service. They received medical treatment as they were deemed to be uneducable. They were uneducable due to the profound nature of, what were referred to as their 'impairments'a term that the social model of disability rejects. They received treatment not teaching and those who were considered to be educable took their place in the education system. The Education [Handicapped Children] Act (HM Government, 1970) changed this and all children, including those with 'a disability of mind', from this point, were seen as educable and became the responsibility of Local Education Authorities. The Warnock Report (DES, 1978), a comprehensive enquiry into the 'education of handicapped children and young people' and the result of a committee working together for almost four years, represented a critical landmark in the education of those who experienced 'special educational needs' (SEN). It identified what provision for a continuum of needs could and should look like. It proposed that education must have, very broadly, the same aims for everyone and that twenty per cent of children, as some stage in their years at school, would experience learning difficulties. These