2006
DOI: 10.1080/07438140609353879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A DNA Fingerprinting Approach for Distinguishing Native and Non-native Milfoils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 We performed molecular identifications of aquarium samples by comparing our sequences to those from Moody and Les' (2010) recent molecular systematic treatment of Myriophyllum. For all but six samples, we based our molecular analyses on DNA sequences from the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2 and the intervening 5.8S ribosomal subunit (hereafter ITS), which has been shown to accurately distinguish species of Myriophyllum Les 2002, 2010;Thum et al 2006Thum et al , 2011. Methods for amplification and sequencing of ITS follow Thum et al (2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 We performed molecular identifications of aquarium samples by comparing our sequences to those from Moody and Les' (2010) recent molecular systematic treatment of Myriophyllum. For all but six samples, we based our molecular analyses on DNA sequences from the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2 and the intervening 5.8S ribosomal subunit (hereafter ITS), which has been shown to accurately distinguish species of Myriophyllum Les 2002, 2010;Thum et al 2006Thum et al , 2011. Methods for amplification and sequencing of ITS follow Thum et al (2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myriophyllum species are notoriously difficult to identify morphologically (e.g., Aiken 1981;Moody and Les 2010) and as a result, some potentially harmful, misidentified species may be sold in the aquarium trade. However, most Myriophyllum species can be distinguished using molecular data (Moody and Les 2010;Thum et al 2006Thum et al , 2011, which offer promise for the accurate identification of taxa sold in the live aquarium trade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We randomly subsampled at least 20 plants for analysis from lakes with more samples. To distinguish Eurasian, hybrid, and northern watermilfoil, plants were identified to taxon using a genetic assay based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) DNA sequence [9,33]. Genetic variation was quantified for sampled plants and specific clones were delineated using eight microsatellite markers developed by Wu et al [34] [33] were used to amplify each microsatellite locus.…”
Section: Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid species may thus have increased likelihood of survival and establishment success in novel habitats. Although most research on invasive hybrids has focused on terrestrial and wetland herbaceous plants [5,7], hybrids have been associated with invasiveness in woody plants [8], submersed aquatic plants [3,9] and animals [10]. Therefore, identifying hybrids and the factors associated with their occurrence and spread is important to understanding biological invasions and informing management of invasive species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concernant les Myriophylles présents aux Etats‐Unis la confusion phénotypique a déjà été prouvée avec M. hippuroides , M. farwellii , M. humile , M. laxum, M. pinnatum & M. verticillatum (Thum et al ., ; Thum & Lennon, 2010). L'approche moléculaire permettrait seule de répondre dans certains cas à une identification délicate (Ghahramanzadeh et al ., ) et peut participer à la reconstitution de l'histoire des invasions biologiques (Thum et al ., ).…”
Section: Identité Du Myriophylleunclassified