2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A DNA-Based Registry for All Animal Species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) System

Abstract: Because many animal species are undescribed, and because the identification of known species is often difficult, interim taxonomic nomenclature has often been used in biodiversity analysis. By assigning individuals to presumptive species, called operational taxonomic units (OTUs), these systems speed investigations into the patterning of biodiversity and enable studies that would otherwise be impossible. Although OTUs have conventionally been separated through their morphological divergence, DNA-based delineat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
1,863
3
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,760 publications
(1,900 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
24
1,863
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 122 parasitoid BINs were found by DNA barcoding. For further species‐level analyses, we treated these BINs as species (Ratnasingham & Hebert, 2013). In addition, 21 distinct morphospecies, which were not successfully barcoded, were also considered as species, altogether resulting in 143 putative parasitoid species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 122 parasitoid BINs were found by DNA barcoding. For further species‐level analyses, we treated these BINs as species (Ratnasingham & Hebert, 2013). In addition, 21 distinct morphospecies, which were not successfully barcoded, were also considered as species, altogether resulting in 143 putative parasitoid species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depressaria sp. and the subfamily Olethreutinae were made by comparing the COI sequences with DNA barcodes in BOLD through their Barcode Index Number (BIN) assignments (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013). The remaining specimens were identified using the identification tool in BOLD, an approach which led to uncertainty in species assignments only for Bucculatrix sp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA barcoding (Hebert et al 2003) can overcome this hurdle if a high quality reference library is available to permit specieslevel matches. Moreover, even if a specific match cannot be made at the time of data acquisition, the deposition of the DNA barcode in BOLD (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007) allows its assignment to a Barcode Index Number (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013) and its subsequent assignment to a species when the barcode reference library gains coverage for that taxon. Further efficiency in the analysis of Malaise trap samples can be achieved if combined with high-throughput sequencing technologies, since presorting of the samples then can be reduced to a minimum (Morinière et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the bulk of the world's sequence data is available in the INSDC, this is not the case for DNA barcodes, most of which reside in the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD) [34,35]. Since 2009 BOLD has released nearly 2.5 million DNA barcodes, with updates every few months.…”
Section: Genomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6b shows a geophylogeny [26] for DNA barcodes from BOLD for Morethia obscura which reveals considerable phylogenetic structure within "Morethia obscura". Specimens of this species are assigned several distinct Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) [35] implying that "Morethia obscura" comprises more than one species.…”
Section: Integrating Biodiversity Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%