2016
DOI: 10.4305/metu.jfa.2016.1.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Divided Capital: Residential Segregation In Ankara

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is interesting with these regeneration areas is that they are either located either along the boundaries between residential areas for low-income groups and high-income groups or unqualified residential areas surrounded by high-income groups, which can be proven by the study in Ankara conducted by Ataç (2016). With these locational strategies, urban regeneration became a segregating process; increasing the heights of symbolic walls between different income groups and making them invisible to each other (see Image 2).…”
Section: Problems Of Urban Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is interesting with these regeneration areas is that they are either located either along the boundaries between residential areas for low-income groups and high-income groups or unqualified residential areas surrounded by high-income groups, which can be proven by the study in Ankara conducted by Ataç (2016). With these locational strategies, urban regeneration became a segregating process; increasing the heights of symbolic walls between different income groups and making them invisible to each other (see Image 2).…”
Section: Problems Of Urban Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ankara is quite segregated along lines of income, education and socio-political issues, and Tunali itself is a good example of this situation as the most contested street (Atac, 2016;F. Erkip, 2010).…”
Section: Urban Resilience and Street Retailingmentioning
confidence: 99%