2010
DOI: 10.2528/pierb10011504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Divergence-Free Bem Method to Model Quasi-Static Currents: Application to Mri Coil Design

Abstract: The modeling of quasi-static optimization problems often involves divergence-free surface current densities. In this paper, a novel technique to implement these currents by using the boundary element method framework is presented. A locally-based characterization of the current density is employed, to render a fully geometry-independent formulation, so that it can be applied to arbitrary shapes. To illustrate the versatility of this approach, we employ it for the design of gradient coils for MRI, providing a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It provides greater contrast between the different soft tissues of the body than computed tomography (CT) does, making it especially useful in neurological (brain), musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and oncological (cancer) imaging [2,3]. The diagnostic values of MRI are greatly magnified by the automated and accurate classification of the MR images [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides greater contrast between the different soft tissues of the body than computed tomography (CT) does, making it especially useful in neurological (brain), musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and oncological (cancer) imaging [2,3]. The diagnostic values of MRI are greatly magnified by the automated and accurate classification of the MR images [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current-density-based method is usually efficient and effective for both regular and irregular geometries but can suffer from local minima in the optimization process. For regularly shaped structures, the current density can be described with Fourier expansions such as the target field (TF) method [6]- [8] and related approaches [9], [10]; for irregularly shaped structures, the coil space is divided into meshes and then the finite element method (FEM) or the boundary element method (BEM) [11]- [14] are used to approximate current density distributions over the coil space. The current density distribution in the coil space can be obtained from the control points in the TF by solving the inverse problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the Biot‐Savart law, the relationship between the current‐carrying discrete points and desired magnetic field within the ROI can be constructed, which can be used to obtain the best possible distribution of current density using an inverse method. Commonly used distributed winding methods include target field method (TF), the boundary element method (BEM), the finite difference method (FDM), and finite element method (FEM) . Among these numerical methods, the BEM is flexible to design coil with arbitrary geometry, which only needs to divide the domain boundary surface, and use the discrete form of control functions to satisfy the boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%