2022
DOI: 10.1109/jsyst.2021.3078826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Disturbance Observer-Based Intelligent Finite-Time Sliding Mode Flight Controller Design for an Autonomous Quadrotor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DOBC offers a feasible method for reducing the negative influence from external disturbance and internal uncertainty by utilizing the estimated disturbance from the DOB and feed it forward to the control signal of an electromechanical system (Choi et al 2003;Chen et al 2016). DOBC has been applied to many real-world systems, e.g., permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) (Dai et al 2021), missile seekers (Sadhu & Ghoshal 2011), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) (Huang & Chen 2022;Tripathi et al 2022), overhead cranes (Wu et al 2020), ship-mounted tower cranes (Qian & Fang 2019), cars with an active suspension system (Pan et al 2016), and dualflexible manipulators with a telescopic arm (Shang et al 2022). For generating a compensation control signal based on the estimated disturbance, most research on designing DOBC (Sadhu & Ghoshal 2011;Pan et al 2016;Qian & Fang 2019;Wu et al 2020;Huang & Chen 2022;Shang et al 2022;Tripathi et al 2022) simply assume that the control signal (i.e., the output of the controller instead of the actuator) and the disturbance signal are of the same type (e.g., both are torques or both are forces).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DOBC offers a feasible method for reducing the negative influence from external disturbance and internal uncertainty by utilizing the estimated disturbance from the DOB and feed it forward to the control signal of an electromechanical system (Choi et al 2003;Chen et al 2016). DOBC has been applied to many real-world systems, e.g., permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) (Dai et al 2021), missile seekers (Sadhu & Ghoshal 2011), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) (Huang & Chen 2022;Tripathi et al 2022), overhead cranes (Wu et al 2020), ship-mounted tower cranes (Qian & Fang 2019), cars with an active suspension system (Pan et al 2016), and dualflexible manipulators with a telescopic arm (Shang et al 2022). For generating a compensation control signal based on the estimated disturbance, most research on designing DOBC (Sadhu & Ghoshal 2011;Pan et al 2016;Qian & Fang 2019;Wu et al 2020;Huang & Chen 2022;Shang et al 2022;Tripathi et al 2022) simply assume that the control signal (i.e., the output of the controller instead of the actuator) and the disturbance signal are of the same type (e.g., both are torques or both are forces).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This compensator do not require a priori information about the saturation errors and is simple to adjust the parameter, thus offsetting the effect of the actual saturation error and ensuring that the system consumes less energy by suppressing unreasonably high gain inputs based on the bounded ideal control inputs. (ii) Compared with the existing scheme of TSMC combined with nonlinear disturbances observers, 29,30 this paper employs not only the observer to compensate for disturbances, but also the adaptive method to compensate for the unknown upper bound of the observer error. The robustness to unmodeled dynamics and external disturbances of the system is further enhanced and the chattering caused by switching control gains is further attenuated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the existing scheme of TSMC combined with nonlinear disturbances observers, 29,30 this paper employs not only the observer to compensate for disturbances, but also the adaptive method to compensate for the unknown upper bound of the observer error. The robustness to unmodeled dynamics and external disturbances of the system is further enhanced and the chattering caused by switching control gains is further attenuated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature 39 proposed sliding mode control strategy for linear impulse systems with matched perturbations that ensured the sliding surface's reachability in finite‐time and the reduced‐order impulse system's stability under sliding motion. In Reference 40, a control strategy based on non‐singular terminal sliding mode and perturbation observer was designed to achieve finite‐time convergence of the closed‐loop system while avoiding the non‐singularity problem for the quadrotor position attitude tracking problem with perturbations. Article 41 investigated the finite‐time convergence of teleoperation with time delays and perturbations and proposed finite‐time terminal sliding mode control strategy for achieving finite‐time convergence of the estimation error as well as the sliding mode surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%