2020
DOI: 10.1002/jae.2778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A distributional synthetic control method for policy evaluation

Abstract: Summary We extend the synthetic control method to evaluate the distributional effects of policy intervention in the possible presence of poor matching. The counterfactuals (or intervention effects) are identified by matching a vector of pre‐intervention quantile residuals of the treated unit and a convex combination of its potential‐control counterparts. The residuals are orthogonal to a set of observable common factors that control for the potentially poor matching. We also apply our method to a set of case s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus far, a comprehensive evaluation method based on empirical analysis has been formed, such as text data mining [ 47 , 48 ], social network analysis [ 49 ], fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [ 50 ], etc. The commonly used empirical analysis tools are PSM-DID model analysis [ 51 ], tool variables [ 52 ] and synthesis control [ 53 ]. The evaluation content is diverse, involving the agricultural economy, finance, science and technology, medical treatment, environment and sustainable development.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, a comprehensive evaluation method based on empirical analysis has been formed, such as text data mining [ 47 , 48 ], social network analysis [ 49 ], fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [ 50 ], etc. The commonly used empirical analysis tools are PSM-DID model analysis [ 51 ], tool variables [ 52 ] and synthesis control [ 53 ]. The evaluation content is diverse, involving the agricultural economy, finance, science and technology, medical treatment, environment and sustainable development.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal is to identify the shape of the counterfactual distribution, not treatment effects for individuals within an aggregate unit. By contrast, linear point‐wise approaches like Chen (2020), or approaches that (i) decompose distributions into bins and (ii) match these bins between the different distributions, are local: they obtain different weights for each quantile and hence obtain weight functions for each individual unit instead of one set of weights at the aggregate level. As a result, these synthetic controls methods are sensitive to the choice of quantiles or bins; in particular, they require the assumption that the optimal weights for each point on the quantile curve or in each bin are the same or at least similar within a given state (e.g., Assumption 1(ii) in Chen (2020)), something that can be difficult to satisfy in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%