1993
DOI: 10.1016/0098-1354(93)80014-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A distributed fault diagnosis method based on digraph models: Steady-state analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this framework a fault tree or a signed digraph is often used to express the in¯uences between variables (see e.g. Iri et al 1979 or Mohindra andClark 1993). Each node of the digraph represents a variable, and the causal relationships between adjacent nodes are indicated by the sign of the connecting arc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework a fault tree or a signed digraph is often used to express the in¯uences between variables (see e.g. Iri et al 1979 or Mohindra andClark 1993). Each node of the digraph represents a variable, and the causal relationships between adjacent nodes are indicated by the sign of the connecting arc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical model-based, 1-5 causal analysis, 6,7 and pattern recognition [8][9][10][11][12][13] are the main groups of fault diagnosis approaches. Chemical processes are often characterized by nonlinear behavior, noisy inputs, and unknown parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method for distributed fault diagnosis has been developed by Mohindra and Clark (1993). The diagnostic search is conducted by a parallel scheme in which every sensor and controller is a smart node participating in the search for possible explanations of observed anomalies.…”
Section: Z3 Z3 Hazard Emulation Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches consider a variety of facets, e. g. distributed fault diagnosis (Mohindra and Clark 1993), providing explanations for the fault (Tarifa and Scenna 1997) and multiple fault scenarios (Vedam and Venkatasubramaniam 1997).…”
Section: Z3 Z3 Hazard Emulation Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%