2015
DOI: 10.7155/jgaa.00354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Distributed Algorithm for Minimum Distance-k Domination in Trees

Abstract: While efficient algorithms for finding minimal distance-k dominating sets exist, finding minimum such sets is NP-hard even for bipartite graphs. This paper presents a distributed algorithm to determine a minimum (connected) distance-k dominating set and a maximum distance-2k independent set of a tree T. It terminates in O(height(T)) rounds and uses O(log k) space. To the best of our knowledge this is the first distributed algorithm that computes a minimum (as opposed to a minimal) distancek dominating set for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown, using a toy example, that our method allow to easily obtain tight complexity bounds, precisely a stabilization time which is asymptotically optimal in rounds and polynomial in moves. Finally, we reviewed a number of existing silent self-stabilizing solutions from the literature [9,35,8,36,37,38,40] where our method applies. In some of them, we were able to provide more general results than those proven in the original papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have shown, using a toy example, that our method allow to easily obtain tight complexity bounds, precisely a stabilization time which is asymptotically optimal in rounds and polynomial in moves. Finally, we reviewed a number of existing silent self-stabilizing solutions from the literature [9,35,8,36,37,38,40] where our method applies. In some of them, we were able to provide more general results than those proven in the original papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm is made of two families of actions A 1 and A 2 : for every node p, We already know that A 1 is bottom-up and correct-alone. Then, from the definitions given in [9], we can easily deduce that A 2 is top-down and correct-alone since f ading(p) depends on p.parent.f ading and q.L with q ∈ p.children, which is not written by the family A 2 . Hence, the graph of actions' causality is…”
Section: Related Work and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…k A survey of distance domination can be found in [15]. For more recent papers see, for example [3,7,9,13,16,18,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%