2019
DOI: 10.1137/17m1151973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Distributed ADMM-like Method for Resource Sharing over Time-Varying Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the work in [36] requires an assumption of strict convexity of the objective functions, whereas in [11] it is assumed only that the functions are convex. We also note some related work is presented in [3], [4], in which distributed primal-dual methods with conic constraints are considered.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the work in [36] requires an assumption of strict convexity of the objective functions, whereas in [11] it is assumed only that the functions are convex. We also note some related work is presented in [3], [4], in which distributed primal-dual methods with conic constraints are considered.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rate is further improved in [6] by optimizing its dependence on the number of nodes. In addition, there are also several ADMM based methods that only work on balanced networks [7]- [9]. By exploiting the mirror relationship between the distributed optimization and distributed resource allocation, several accelerated distributed resource allocation algorithms are given in [10].…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its convergence rate is unclear if either the strongly convexity or the Lipschitz smoothness is removed. In [9], a push-sum based algorithms is given in tie with the ADMM. Although it can handle time-varying networks, the convergence rate is O(1/k) even for strongly convex and Lipschitz smooth functions.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such algorithms with vanishing step sizes cannot be extended to handle problems with timevarying objectives and usually exhibits poor convergence. A recent work [11] has proposed a class of algorithms to handle the resource sharing problem under the conic constraints. The algorithms are built on a modified Lagrangian function and an ADMM-like scheme for seeking a saddle point of the Lagrangian function, which has been shown to have an ergodic O(1/k) rate for agents' objective functions and constraints violation.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithms are built on a modified Lagrangian function and an ADMM-like scheme for seeking a saddle point of the Lagrangian function, which has been shown to have an ergodic O(1/k) rate for agents' objective functions and constraints violation. The problem formulation in [11] treats (1) as a special case: the constraint (1b) is replaced by the more general on consensus and push-sum approaches [12], a recent reference [13] proposes a distributed algorithm for solving problem (1) over time-varying directed networks and provides convergence guarantees. Aside from the above algorithms which are all discrete-time methods, there are some continuous-time algorithms such as the one in reference [14], where convergence under general convexity assumption is ensured.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%