1993
DOI: 10.1101/gad.7.12a.2357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A distant 10-bp sequence specifies the boundaries of a programmed DNA deletion in Tetrahymena.

Abstract: Programmed DNA deletion occurs at thousands of specific sites in most ciliates studied. To understand the mechanism of this prominent DNA rearranging process, we analyzed one of the deletion elements {the M-element) in Tetrahymena by making specific mutations in cloned DNAs and testing their effects on rearrangement in vivo. We found that a 10-bp polypurine sequence {5'-AAAAAGGGGG1 plays a crucial role. This sequence is located at a short distance {-45 bpl outside of the element on either side. Removal of it a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
68
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…cis-acting signals have been identified for only one of the five developmentally regulated rearrangements studied to date in T. thermophila. Ten-base-pair A5G5 polypurine tracts near the junctions of the M rearrangement have been shown to be both necessary and sufficient cis-acting sequences (5,23,24). Since the other four rearrangements in T. thennophila analyzed to date all lack A5G5 sequences, the polypurine tracts cannot be the universal signal for DNA rearrangement in T. thermophila.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…cis-acting signals have been identified for only one of the five developmentally regulated rearrangements studied to date in T. thermophila. Ten-base-pair A5G5 polypurine tracts near the junctions of the M rearrangement have been shown to be both necessary and sufficient cis-acting sequences (5,23,24). Since the other four rearrangements in T. thennophila analyzed to date all lack A5G5 sequences, the polypurine tracts cannot be the universal signal for DNA rearrangement in T. thermophila.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The polypurine tracts are outside the deleted DNA and direct DNA rearrangement at a distance of 41 to 54 bp. Short direct repeats at the in vivo junctions of M are not required for rearrangement but may play a role in fine tuning the choice of junction site (24). The R rearrangement, the deletion near the calmodulin gene, and mse2.9 all lack polypurine tracts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar methods were previously developed for T. thermophila (29), and studies of eliminated sequences in this organism have shown that flanking DNA plays an important role in these events (3,8,14,20). In the case of the Tetrahymena M element, it is clear that a 10-bp sequence (A 5 G 5 ) located 50 bp outside the deleted region is sufficient to specify one end of the DNA splice junction (9). Interestingly, our results demonstrate the importance of flanking sequences in elimination of the Paramecium 28-bp internal IES.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Analysis of the M element revealed a requirement for a 10-bp DNA sequence (A 5 G 5 ) located about 45 bp outside the left boundary that has a corresponding partner found in inverted orientation about 45 bp outside the right boundary (8). Inserting different lengths of DNA between the 10-bp sequence and the normal splice boundary does not prevent excision but alters the boundary in a corresponding manner so that a distance of about 45 bp is maintained (9). Therefore, the sequence element not only is required but also specifies the deletion boundary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, mechanistic studies in Tetrahymena revealed that the sequences at the boundaries of IESs were not essential. Instead, sequences located a short distance (45-50 bp) outside the excision boundaries, which are in the DNA that remains in the somatic genome, were shown to determine the boundaries of excision (Godiska et al 1993;Chalker et al 1999;Patil and Karrer 2000;Fillingham et al 2001). These regulatory sequences that specify the excision boundaries share little, if any, similarity with one another, a fact that has always been hard to reconcile with a transposon origin.…”
Section: Piggymac: the Domestication Of A Transposasementioning
confidence: 99%